Even though my blog is less than a month old, I've already been accused of several different identities, professions, and religions. It's a polemically paradoxical world out there.
As for personal data, all that matters is that I have an allergy to wingnuts.
Winston
P.S. Seriously, though, Curious George's performance on CTV should have come with a PG 13 rating.
I've seen some of that wingnuttery, usually signed by someone named Anonymous, all aimed at you.
The sock puppets are having a hard time figuring out what simplistic label will fit you best in their own mind so they won't have to think about anything.
One comment that Sen Baker said on CBC this morning was interesting. He referenced that every province except NL received a call from the Feds in November informing the province's about impending changes on the budget.
Apologies if this is old news... but it begs the question on what directives were given to Finance officials when disemenating information. Was this info shared in a conference call with the prov's (except NL) or face to face meetings with prov and fed officials in Novemeber? I suspect the latter, but it makes you wonder what our IGA and our rep in Ottawa is doing??. Of course that question is completeely rhetorical!!!
If Sen Baker's comments are accurate , the troubling aspect was that there was a provincial meeting of Fin Minister's in Sask on December 16th and 17th.
The release stated..... "The meeting will provide an opportunity to discuss recent global and Canadian economic and financial developments, as well as provincial and territorial economic and fiscal outlooks"
One would think that our Finacial Min and his officials would have caught wind that the Feds were on the phones the month before dicussing issues with the provinces.
If Sen Bakers assertions are correct then more questions need to sked. If not, then the term wingnuttery is certainly relevant!
3 comments:
Ed,
Even though my blog is less than a month old, I've already been accused of several different identities, professions, and religions. It's a polemically paradoxical world out there.
As for personal data, all that matters is that I have an allergy to wingnuts.
Winston
P.S. Seriously, though, Curious George's performance on CTV should have come with a PG 13 rating.
I've seen some of that wingnuttery, usually signed by someone named Anonymous, all aimed at you.
The sock puppets are having a hard time figuring out what simplistic label will fit you best in their own mind so they won't have to think about anything.
wingnuttery...I like it.
One comment that Sen Baker said on CBC this morning was interesting. He referenced that every province except NL received a call from the Feds in November informing the province's about impending changes on the budget.
Apologies if this is old news... but it begs the question on what directives were given to Finance officials when disemenating information. Was this info shared in a conference call with the prov's (except NL) or face to face meetings with prov and fed officials in Novemeber? I suspect the latter, but it makes you wonder what our IGA and our rep in Ottawa is doing??. Of course that question is completeely rhetorical!!!
If Sen Baker's comments are accurate , the troubling aspect was that there was a provincial meeting of Fin Minister's in Sask on December 16th and 17th.
The release stated..... "The meeting will provide an opportunity to discuss recent global and Canadian economic and financial developments, as well as provincial and territorial economic and fiscal outlooks"
One would think that our Finacial Min and his officials would have caught wind that the Feds were on the phones the month before dicussing issues with the provinces.
If Sen Bakers assertions are correct then more questions need to sked. If not, then the term wingnuttery is certainly relevant!
Anthony Roy
Post a Comment