Pages

05 May 2005

A floor walker speaks, or soft-shelled excuses

Sometimes you hear interesting things on the way to Tim Horton's.

Like this evening, when cabinet minister Tom Rideout called Nite Line to explain why Fabian Manning got the flick from the Progressive Conservative caucus.

Rideout began by listing his experience as probably the longest serving member in the House of Assembly and the one who has sat in more caucuses than any currently sitting member.

Fair enough on that score, Tom, although those of us with memories recall that you switched from the Liberal Opposition benches in 1984 to the Peckford team in order to get a cabinet seat. Bill Rowe once listed you among the legion of fellows who practiced the old-fashioned political art in this province of wearing out carpets by crossing the floor of the House to sit with another team.

Rideout's explanation of the caucus move was that the government needed to have complete support of its members to get government business through the legislature.

Here are three reasons why Rideout's argument makes no sense:

1. The government party has so many members that even if half the back benchers voted against the government, they'd still win any vote as long as everyone showed up.

2. Manning has given absolutely no indication that he intends to vote against the government on any bill, especially a money bill or other confidence vote.

3. The whole crab deal is not contained in any bill scheduled to come before the House.

So what exactly was the problem, Tom?

If it is as trivial the Premier and Mr. Manning getting bent over a misunderstanding of which Manning is which, surely goodness they can find enough common ground to kiss and make up.

This is hardly like Tom's floor crossing, the Wells/Crosbie business, Ross Wiseman's cover of a tune by Tom Rideout or even the Wilson Callan thing.

Maybe the Premier found old strategy notes stuck in a filing cabinet somewhere from the Grimes-Efford fiasco and used them as a guide.