The Premier had a carefully rehearsed message when reporters asked him on Thursday why he had appointed everyone in cabinet back to their old portfolios despite an election that had reduced his party to a minority government.
A cabinet of "experience, consistency, and stability," Dwight Ball called them.
He used the word "experienced" a couple of times and emphasised the word "stable" as he finished the answer to one question. You can find a bit of Ball's scrum with reporters at about the 42 minute mark of CBC's Here and Now broadcast. NTV's story got the "stability" message loud and clear.
The election result was a shock to many people. People can debate what it meant that voters didn't endorse any one party to have a majority in the legislature.
Ball has a political problem even if he is in heavy denial about it but all the talk about experience and stability wasn't about dealing with a political problem. Voters aren't panicked by the minority government.
Ball was dealing with a financial problem. His plans depend heavily on the ability to borrow a couple of billions dollars to make his budget work. Ball will have a much harder time borrowing money if the bond-rating agencies take a dim view of his government's ability to manage public finances in the wake of the election.
The real political division in society is between authoritarians and libertarians.
Pages
▼
31 May 2019
29 May 2019
Deficit *is* higher than previously announced #nlpoli
The House of Assembly will have to deliver a budget that keeps access to new public debt for the foreseeable future. The politicians must satisfy the bond-rating agencies, not the voters.
Parties don't matter. Ideologies don't matter. Voters don't matter.
That is the essence of politics in Newfoundland and Labrador in the early 21st century.
Anyone who knows Dwight Ball knows that he does not make simple mistakes with numbers.
Yet, the official explanation is that he made a simple mistake with numbers on Sunday's Issues and Answers when he said the deficit for the current year is between $800 and $900 million dollars. SRBP pointed out his comments on Tuesday.
As NTV's Michael Connors reported first via Twitter and later on the NTV Evening News, Premier's Office and finance department officials claim that the Premier's comments "were actually looking ahead to 2020-21, which has a projected deficit of $796 million." The deficit projection for 2019 remains at $577 million, according to officials.
28 May 2019
Deficit $250 - $300 million higher than announced before election according to Premier #nlpoli
In the episode that aired on 26 May 2019, Premier Dwight Ball told NTV's Issues and Answers that the deficit for the current budget is between $800 - $900 million.
"Are you prepared to make any specific changes to the budget in order to get their support?" asked Mike Connors.
"I think this budget is the one we ran on... everyone understands this budget is between an 800 to 900 million dollar deficit..."
Minor problem.
When finance minister Tom Osborne delivered the budget on April 16, he confirmed that the deficit in the budget the Liberals ran on was $575 million, once you took out the payments from the Hibernia Asset-Backed Dividend Agreement. That's the figure finance officials gave during the budget lock-up to media and other groups.
"Are you prepared to make any specific changes to the budget in order to get their support?" asked Mike Connors.
"I think this budget is the one we ran on... everyone understands this budget is between an 800 to 900 million dollar deficit..."
Minor problem.
When finance minister Tom Osborne delivered the budget on April 16, he confirmed that the deficit in the budget the Liberals ran on was $575 million, once you took out the payments from the Hibernia Asset-Backed Dividend Agreement. That's the figure finance officials gave during the budget lock-up to media and other groups.
27 May 2019
Simon Lono , 1963-2019
Simon Lono - husband, father, grandfather, advocate, orator, writer, mentor, friend - died Friday, May 24, 2019.
He was 56.When our friends are alive, we do not spend time thinking about the past. We do not think about how we met them, about all the things we did with them, or why it is that we like them.
When they are alive, we do not need to remember
because they are there, every day.
We only feel a need to remember, once they are not
there any more.
Simon Lono’s family and friends spent Saturday as they
are likely to spend a lot of days from now on.
They thought about him, remembered when they first met him, all the
things they had done together, why they loved him.
Simon is dead.
And so, we remember.
We recall.
Frantically.
As if the memories will make the hard truth go away.
As if the memories will replace all of the things that
could have been or would have been.
But that will never be.
Because there is a hard truth.
Simon is dead.
Killed by a rare disease.
In itself, entirely fitting.
21 May 2019
The Lowest-Common Denominator Minority Legislature #nlpoli
An inherently unstable minority legislature where the parties have a history of finding political agreement through public spending is not exactly a recipe for tough decisions.
There is something seductively sweet about the idea
that the minority government that resulted from last week’s general election
has now solved all our problems Just get back to work, some people are saying. And play nice, together. No more of this bickering and name-calling.
Something seductively sweet but the sweetness reveals
itself as bitter naïveté when one considers that we now have a fundamentally
unstable legislature at the very time when both the government’s finances and
the Muskrat Falls mess are coming together.
Make no mistake about it. Minority legislatures are inherently
unstable. They tend not to last more
than a couple of years. The one elected last week will get through six months
or so without much chance of upheaval.
But once the opposition parties have sorted out their finances and, in
all likelihood, the Tories have found a new leader, they will be ready to bring
down the House.
17 May 2019
The 1908 Election all over again #nlpoli
You will
hear a lot of spin about Thursday’s election result.
Doesn’t matter where it is coming from.
It is all spin and all spin is bullshit.
Doesn’t matter where it is coming from.
It is all spin and all spin is bullshit.
Thursday
night’s election result has been coming for three years. The polls have pointed to the public mood and
their views of parties and leaders. Only
the blind ignored it. Robocalls and dirty tricks did not produce the result. No Blue Waves were involved.
The Forecast
On Thursday morning, SRBP posted a projection based on polling and information coming from
all three parties directly and indirectly.
Here’s how
it played out compared to the result at about 10:00 PM Thursday.
Lib
|
PC
|
NDP
|
Ind
|
|
Forecast
|
19
|
18
|
1
|
2
|
Range
|
+/- 2
|
+/- 3
|
+/- 1
|
- 1
|
Actual
|
20
|
15
|
3
|
2
|
The Liberal
projection was almost bang on. The
Conservatives were within the range of the projection. The Independent forecast was bang on. Only the NDP exceeded expectations and that
was by virtue of a good candidate who succeeded, in some respects, despite the deadweight
of the Dipper crowd in town.
16 May 2019
Poor Ed's Almanac - a hot summer is coming #nlpoli
The prospect of a minority government coupled with the need to pass a budget in the legislature after the election could produce a long, hot summer of political manoeuvring.Mainstreet Research released its poll on the Newfoundland and Labrador election. It basically shows what Abacus and Forum showed, which is a slightly Conservative lead in overall vote intention.
With that and the election due tomorrow, here's a guess at a possible seat count. This is based on the polls, observation of the campaign, and a bit of guesswork. There is no right answer and this version could be off by a seat or two for the Liberals. You might add an extra New Democrat to the mix but no more. There might be one fewer Independent.
13 May 2019
Ego, Brain Farts, and Electoral Reform #nlpoli
Public ignorance of our political system is a scourge. Tackling that is the first step to meaningful electoral reform in Newfoundland and Labrador. The second priority is to make sure the players do not set the rules for everyone, as they have done repeatedly, and disastrously, since 2003. Most of all, we need to get on with reform, as soon as possible.While there are many good reasons for electoral reform in Newfoundland and Labrador, most of the recent talk of changes to how elections run in the province is from people who want to give an advantage to a party they like.
Take the decision in 2015 to slash public representation
in the House. The Conservatives who were
behind the notion, figured it would be easier to win a majority of 20 seats
instead of 48. They knew they couldn’t get 24 but hoped they could cling to
power with 20 or 21. Depending on how
the count goes on Thursday, they might be right.
The Liberals who backed the cuts, like Dwight Ball, were
concerned only that the idea appeared popular.
They thought that by siding with a popular initiative they would gain
favour with voters.
Lots of popular things don’t drive votes and this was one
of them. If they thought about the
electoral math – and there’s no sign they did – then they likely hit on the
same self-serving reason the Conservatives did.
Depending on how the count goes on Thursday, they might be as right or as
wrong as the Conservatives when they last held power.
Then there’s the business of fixed election dates.
09 May 2019
The Abacus Poll for Election 2019 #nlpoli
The chart below looks like there has been a huge jump up and
down in “no choice” and a corresponding big change in party choice but actually
there is some consistency across the board.
Click to enlarge |
As SRBP has been saying for a couple of months, the Conservatives
and Liberals have basically been polling in the 20s for the past three
years. These results are within that 10-point
spread, allowing with the odd leap above 30 or below 20. The “no choice” option (green dotted line)
has been consistently above 35 the whole time.
Abacus is an outlier in that sense but, there is an election campaign
underway.
The Abacus poll – conducted between May 2 and May 5 – shows the
Conservatives in the lead with the Liberals trailing., But here’s the thing, the gap, even in the presentation of “decideds”
or “committed” is really inside the bounds of possibilities covered by the
margin of error.
Just to drive the point home. Here is a sample of MQO and Abacus results
over the past year or so.
|
Liberal
|
Conservative
|
New Democrat
|
No Choice
|
Abacus Feb-18
|
22
|
18
|
12
|
48
|
Abacus May-18
|
22
|
24
|
13
|
41
|
MQO Apr-19
|
25
|
20
|
06
|
47
|
Abacus May-19
|
29
|
33
|
12
|
21
|
08 May 2019
Election 2019 - First Poll #nlpoli
While the MQO poll shows the Liberals in the lead, a new poll from Abacus - released with an hour of this appearing - will likely show that since the debate, the political landscape of the province has changed dramatically.
The latest
poll from MQO showed that after a week and bit of campaigning, voters were
almost precisely where they were at the end of March when MQO conducted a poll
for NTV.
When asked
which party they would vote for in an election, 47% made no choice compared to
56% in March. More chose Liberals
(25/21) than Conservatives (20/18) or New Democrats (6/4). One percent chose
the NL Alliance and one percent chose the Green Party. Neither registered support in March.
The gap
between Liberals and Conservatives is within the margin of error.
Detailed poll data courtesy MQO Research Click image to enlarge |
The
variation between March and April results is also within the margin of error
for the poll (plus or minus four percentage points 19 times out of 20). The
margin of error for the “decideds”-only sub-sample, widely reported by news
media, would be higher since it based on only half the total sample.
NTV
included a question in the MQO quarterly omnibus. They asked which party people thought would
win the election. 46% of respondents
chose the Liberals, 21% the Conservatives and 30% made no choice. This is a
useful question since research suggests the response to this question
frequently closely matches the popular vote result in an election.
06 May 2019
The Financial Reality of Election 2019 #nlpoli
The financial reality confronting any administration after May 16 is the same regardless of which party wins the election.The government is unlikely to balance the budget in 2022, regardless of who wins the 2019 election.
In 2019, as in 2015, the last
government budget before the election did not accurately describe the
government’s current or likely future financial position. All three parties did not make this an
election issue in 2015 and have ignored the government’s financial situation in
2019.
The governing Liberals are
running on their current budget, which is included in the campaign platform. They apparently
have no new spending plans beyond the current budget. The Conservatives cost their plan at $254
million. These promises must be assessed against the financial realities of the provincial government.
The Financial Situation
We can accept the government forecasts of revenue for what they are although there are some issues, as noted below. We must add the following expenditures to the government's projected spending in 2020 and beyond. These additional expenses are why it is highly unlikely the government will balance the books in 2022.