The success of Twitter isn’t being driven by teenagers or even twentysomethings.
It’s being driven by adults.
The public nature of Twitter is particularly sensitive for the under-18 set, whether because they want to hide what they are doing from their parents or, more often, because their parents restrict their interaction with strangers on the Web.
-srbp-
1. From early 1990s Australia, “Accidentally Kelly Street” by Frente.
2. Then Frente’s acoustic cover of New Order’s “Bizarre Love Triangle”:
3. And to finish off, New Order with a recent live version:
Well Ron claims he has a plan in slick little web ads that pop up on some Telegram pages.
Ron calls it The Ellsworth Essentials.
Ron says he has a vision.
A vision of Ron as mayor, apparently.
Ron thinks that this slick little campaign will serve to help Ron fulfill his vision.
It might.
But that doesn’t mean the city will be better off.
That’s because Ron doesn’t have a plan for the city itself.
Ron says the city needs a plan.
He’s right.
It needs a plan badly.
And Ron is ready to provide such a plan.
In fact, having a plan for the city is so important that Ron’s first plan is to develop a plan.
But not before the election.
He’ll develop the plan later.
When later?
After we’ve elected Ron and his vision to be mayor.
How long after that, then?
Ron won’t say.
But did I tell you Ron has a vision?
Oh.
I did.
Well, he does.
So while Ron has a vision and doesn’t have a plan, he does plan to get a plan.
Sometime.
Meanwhile, Ron will be doing other stuff.
Without the plan he should have now, before he gets elected.
Stuff like spending your money.
How much money is a mystery.
Apparently telling you - the people of St. John’s - how much of your money he wants to spend on his “essentials” is not essential to Ron’s vision.
Or his plan.
When he finally gets one.
Eventually.
Ron will spend your money on snow clearing, which, as part of Essential Number Three Ron assures us will be “better”.
It will be “better” because Ron “will shorten plow [sic] routes to provide better snow clearing service for the city with intensified efforts to get to the curb the first time, thereby reducing the number of plow [sic] passes needed to get the job done right.”
Good, sez you.
We need “better” snow clearing.
We do.
“Better” snow clearing sounds great.
It does.
Except for the few minor problems.
First, getting to the curb the first time is not a function of how long a route the snow plough has to travel. It is a function of how much snow falls in a given period.
Very little snow and one plough can do the whole city the first time, right back to your doorstep, let alone the curb. Tons of snow coupled with high winds and freezing rain – a typical St. John’s storm, he said on somewhat tongue in cheek - and the entire snow plough supply of Canada won’t get you to work in 15 minutes.
So Ron’s vision is – shall we say – just a little fuzzy on this crucial point of how shortening the length of a route will make snow clearing “better.”
Second, we don’t know how many snow ploughs will Ron need to “get the job done right.”
Ron doesn’t say.
Ron doesn’t say likely because Ron doesn’t know.
Ron just has a vision.
So let’s just say - for argument sake – that Ron thinks that in order to get the job done “right”, a snow plough route should be 11.5 kilometres long instead of the current 23 kilometres.
That would mean Ron needs twice as many trucks and twice as many employees as the city currently has.
This will not make snow clearing “better” because the route length isn’t the key thing.
But let’s humour Ron.
Doubling how much you pay for snow clearing doesn’t work out to “better” snow clearing.
It just means you pay more.
Which brings us to point three:
How will Ron pay for all this?
Ron doesn’t know.
That’s something to be worked out.
Maybe.
because nowhere in Ron’s vision does Ron say he will ever figure out how much all this stuff will cost or how much he’ll get you to pay for it.
Meanwhile Ron is concerned about public debt.
He wants to be responsible “with your tax dollars.”
No plan.
Lots of promises.
That’s how taxpayers got the huge debt in the first place.
More of the same is not a vision.
It’s a nightmare.
So where will Ron find the money for snow clearing?
Look at your wallet.
That’s where Ron will get the money for his vision.
Keep looking at your wallet.
Ron has more ideas.
Remember the para-transit tax grab?
That’s just the beginning.
Now Ron thinks it is “essential” to put together buses, para-transit and – wait for it – commercially run taxi cabs – in a single transportation system paid for, presumably, with your tax dollars.
Ron also wants more affordable housing.
Great idea.
It’s a federal and provincial responsibility. Let Danny and Steve figure it out.
Let Danny and Steve tell Len to pay for it.
But if Ron gets together with Danny and Steve, those three won’t be footing the bill.
You will.
Ron Ellsworth has a vision.
No plan.
Just a vision.
Lots of people have visions.
Visions are nice.
But if Ron Ellsworth thinks he can reach into my pocket and suck out whatever cash is there to pay for stuff without a real plan, then Ron isn’t having a vision.
Ron is seeing things.
And hearing voices.
People who see things and hear voices don’t get to be mayor.
They should be under a doctor’s care.
-srbp-
Lower tuition is attracting Nova Scotians to do an undergraduate degree at Memorial University in large numbers.
The tuition freeze – in place since the late 1990s and carried on by the current administration – makes Memorial particularly attractive given, on top of that, the calibre of instruction.
The growth in Nova Scotian enrolment is between 800 and 900 per cent higher today than it was a decade ago.
You can get a more details from Dale Kirby through an interview he did with what sounds like Information Boring at CBC Nova Scotia.
-srbp-
Via nottawa, the curious connection between French president Nicolas Sarkozy, seal bashing and a recent government decision to drop $20 million of public money on three onshore exploration licenses.
-srbp-
The short history of a curious idea.
2007: Promise to grant Sir Wilfred Grenfell College “more autonomy” regardless of cost implications among other things.
2008: Promise legislation by fall; fail to deliver. Make (up) excuses.
2009: Still no legislation. Dodge hard questions.
Maybe a problem with finding students – something your humble e-scribbler noted as a major deficiency in the original consultants’ report – is another reason for the inexplicable delay in the whole Grenfell autonomy “piece.”
There is no analysis of the possible student market. This is a critical shortcoming since the report authors recommend doubling the size of the student population in short order, from a current enrolment of about 1,150 (not including 200 nursing students) to about 2,000.
In any event, just add Grenfell “autonomy’ as another government initiative on the MIA list.
-srbp-
Education minister Darin King seemed a wee bit confused about his own department’s policies in a recent macleans.ca story on competition among Atlantic Canada universities for students.
Darin King, the minister of education in Newfoundland and Labrador, said his province already has a recruiting advantage over its regional competitors.
Since 2001, tuition fees in the province have been frozen. And earlier this month, the Newfoundland and Labrador government eliminated interest on provincial student loans - the first province in the country to do so - in a move that could make it a more attractive place to study.
"We're trying to do our best to offer a student aid package ... and enticing them to come to Newfoundland," King said.
Of course, eliminating interest on provincial government student loans wouldn’t entice students from outside Newfoundland and Labrador “to come to Newfoundland” since they wouldn’t be eligible for that assistance.
Interest elimination only applies to residents of the province who receive student loans from the province. On top of that – because of the peculiarities of something called geography – they wouldn’t have to be enticed to come to the place where they already live anyway.
So it seems that education minister King can’t really explain at all what sort of “recruiting advantage” post-secondary institutions in Newfoundland and Labrador have when it comes to “enticing [students] to come to Newfoundland.”
He also doesn’t know the name of the province he represents either, but that’s another issue.
Perhaps the next time King gets one of the now infamous oral briefings for ministers, he should try a novel approach and take notes. That would be something he presumably learned to do as a student. Either that or he can get his officials to prepare written briefing notes so he can refer back to them later on. After all, notes are what students use to help them keep track of a wide range of information on a wide range of topics.
As education minister, Darin King should know the value of a written note even if some of his colleagues are more interested in covering their asses than covering the material.
This interview certainly shows the importance of a cabinet mi9nister knowing what he is talking about.
-srbp-
The sorry tale of the Summer of Discontent in Gander turns out to be a much sorrier tale than first appeared.
At the end of a story entitled “One Judge Short” from last February (not online), The Beacon reported that then-provincial Court Chief Judge Reg Reid had “requested the minister fill the position [in Gander] as quickly as possible.”
It seems that justice minister Tom Marshall could have used the same list of candidates from which he picked Don Singleton for a round of musical judicial chairs to also find a name to fill the vacancy in Gander.
When the Singleton appointment went sour, though, Marshall did nothing with either of the two vacancies. Nor did he do anything with the list of candidates in front of him either – except flick it to one side - even though there were other names on it of people who not only met the bare minimums set out in the legislation but exceeded them.
And that was six months ago.
In the meantime, not only are there still vacancies in Gander and St. John’s yet to be filled but two more have turned up.
Chief Judge Reg Reid retired in April. That leaves newbie Judge Mark Pike in the role of assistant chief judge, a position that appears to have been created for him to fill but there is still a new vacancy in St. John’s.
On top of that, Judge Joe Woodrow – familiar to visitors to Courtroom Number Seven - opted to retire in February and now sits on a per diem basis (as required).
There you have it: three judges’ seats in St. John’s empty and one in Gander, all of which need to be filled. Plus – and for some equally unfathomable reason – cabinet has not gotten around to appointing a replacement for Reid even though he’s been gone since April. The chief judge’s job is a cabinet appointment, you see.
As a sign of how serious the problem is in Gander, consider that The Beacon reported last February the issue came up at a Gander town council meeting that month.
The chair of the town’s economic development committee wanted someone to have a chat with Hander member of the House of Assembly Kevin O’Brien. The prospect of having cases directed to other towns caused some furrowed brows, it seems, since the people attending trials in Gander bring with them a certain benefit to the local innkeepers and restauranteurs. The slowdown in the courthouse meant a slowdown in the local economy.
Now this sort of dithering and delay is nothing new either for the justice department or the current administration as a whole.
Retired justice Bill Marshall (no relation) has been working on not one but two separate “reviews” one of which appears to have been underway since 2004. Not a thing has come of either review and the government is also refusing to release any information about the status of either review.
Since 2003, a surprising number of senior public service positions have gone without a permanent appointment for periods of up to two years. Some are appointed on an acting basis for extraordinarily long times and for no apparent reason. In other instances, legislation is passed but not put into effect and in other instances, reports and promised policies have sat untended for two or three years. It’s all part of the “missing in action” syndrome that befalls chunks of government these days.
Now part of the cause of all this might be that the appointments to the bench are supposed to be made - ultimately - by the Lieutenant Governor-in-Council. That’s legalese ease for cabinet. And, if the practice with deputy ministers is any indication, “cabinet appointment” now means the picks are made by the Premier Himself and only the Premier.
And if he is pre-occupied with other things, no matter what those other things are, … well, that’s been pretty much the old, old story of this administration since Day One.
-srbp-
In the United Kingdom, an inquiry into the expenses scandal at Whitehall is running into members of parliament griping about their quality of life. The MPs want improvements, so it seems, despite the excesses which have been revealed in the past few months.
Meanwhile, the Bow Wow parliament has a committee holding hearings before the committee submits recommendations on a new pay and allowances scheme for local politicians to the House of Assembly management committee.
Ostensibly, the committee wants to get public input. So far only five people have turned up to offer views to the committee at hearings held across the province.
That’s hardly surprising given that the committee is holding hearings during the time when most people in the province - including most politicians - take a nice long break from the business of politics.
But here’s the question no one seems to have asked in Newfoundland and Labrador: why is the committee out there in the first place?
The politicians will tell you they appointed the committee because it is in the Green bill, the legislation that came after the local spending scandal hit daylight. Now that is true, but there was considerable discretion available to the legislators.
Since they got their salaries set in 2007 at the time of the last election, they could have amended the legislation so that the next salary committee wouldn’t be appointed until after the next general election 2011. They also could have delayed appointing the current committee until some time in early 2011, thus giving members of the legislature a full four years at their old pay scheme before they would look at an increase.
Either of those approaches would have shown some restraint on the part of members. This might have been prudent given that the public is more than a wee bit soured on them after listening to the litany of miss-spending and excuses for same that poured forth from the honorable members.
And it’s not like the poor darlings wouldn’t have seen any pay hikes in the meantime. Under section 15(3) of the Green bill, they would have collected the same percentage increases the executive of the public got in any given year. That’s not bad for a crowd making a hefty wage anyways and given that almost half of them or more are drawing extra pay allotments, members of the legislature can hardly claim they’ve been hard done by.
Rather than do either of those things, the members of the legislature - most or all of whom are members of the successor to the old internal economy commission - decided to go for a restructuring of their pay and allowances scheme in addition to the annual percentage hikes a mere two years after the system came into effect in the first place.
They decided to do it at a time when the public are – for the most part – simply not paying attention to things political. The politicians discussed postponing things until the fall, incidentally, but decided to carry on such that the bulk of the work was being done at the worst possible time of the year.
Well, worst possible time if one was serious about getting public input. The resolution appointing the committee went through the House in May. The committee must report no later than the end of October. The hearings will be over and done – save for one – by the end of August.
Their report will then find its way back to the House of Assembly where it will be passed, one expects, as quickly and as quietly as possible in what has become a notoriously lightweight and very short fall sitting of the House.
That’s pretty much how most things involving pay and allowances for members have been handled over the past decade. Despite all the public furor, despite all the revelations of miss-spending, the members of the provincial legislature are carrying on much as they have always done when their pay and allowances are involved.
Old habits - it seems - die very hard indeed.
-srbp-
The seizure of assets belonging to three companies last December may have been popular but it could wind up being very costly:
According to Prof. [Russell] Williams and Vancouver-based trade expert Henri Alvarez of Fasken Martineau, Abitibi has a strong case: NAFTA’s Chapter 11 was designed explicitly to prevent these kinds of scenarios. In Prof. Williams’s [sic] view, the suit, if filed, could hit Ottawa with a big legal bill that will likely get passed on to Newfoundland.
Financial costs aren’t the only issue at stake here; there’s also the small matter of how foreign investors are likely to react. For now, government officials aren’t keen to discuss it. Williams’ government would not comment; neither would Trade Minister Stockwell Day. Department of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Laura Dalby said the fact that a notice of intent has been filed “does not establish the merits of a challenge.”
-srbp-
From the agreed statement of facts in R. v Aylward comes a description of the events on the night in question which might help readers appreciate the incident.
You may recall this as the case in which Judge John Rorke, as he then was, uttered his now infamous words about pots to piss in and the young accused having put both the judge and the Crown prosecutor in a jam.
Note that in reproducing the agreed statement of facts, your humble e-scribbler has reduced the names of the young men involved in the sorry episode to initials, with the exception of the young man convicted by Judge Rorke. Dates of birth for each have also been omitted as well as the street numbers in the addresses at which the incident took place.
At the time of the incident, all but one of the young men present were over the age of 18 years and none was over the legal drinking age. The one young man under age 18 was present but was not identified as playing a key role.
The name and age of the victim are also not given in the version below.
Although this information is part of the public record and as such are readily available the information the information is not necessary to appreciate the incident and the sentence imposed initially as well as the change in sentence on appeal.
[Taken from: R. v. Aylward, [1998] N.J. No. 338, 170 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 185, 22 C.R. (5th) 191, 40 W.C.B. (2d) 494 Docket: 98/117, the decision rendered on this case on the appeal by the Crown about the sentence imposed.]
On June 21, 1998, Jeffrey Aylward … attended a party hosted by MR …at his residence at …Paddy Dobbin Drive, St. John's, Newfoundland. MR’s parents and younger brother were away on vacation at this time. Most of his guests departed by about 1:00 a.m. on June 22, 1998. Remaining at the residence were Jeffrey Aylward, MR, RR …, RL …, AH …, SM …, MJ …, and AH ... .
At about 1:30 a.m. someone suggested ordering a pizza. Since no one had any money to pay for the pizza, it was decided that it would be ordered anyway, and Jeffrey Aylward and RR would steal it from the delivery man. MR placed the order for the pizza with the local establishment "Pizza Pros". He ordered it to be delivered to … Paddy Dobbin Drive, a house two doors up the street, and made up a phone number. At the time of placing the order, MR knew that he was setting up the pizza delivery man. When the order was initially placed, the intent was to simply steal it; however, after the order was placed Jeffrey Aylward and RR decided that they did not want to confront the delivery man empty handed.
Alcohol was consumed that evening. Jeffrey Aylward believes he drank around twelve (12) beer; RR, eight (8); and MR, three (3).
Jeffrey Aylward and RR first asked MR for masks and then for weapons. M R gave Jeffrey Aylward a ski-mask and RR a "Freddy" Halloween mask. Jeffrey Aylward was given a "Tonfa", which is a wooden t-shaped baton designed for the sport of Kung Fu, and RR was given a wooden stick, about two and a half feet long. Since RR found the Halloween mask to be uncomfortable, he ended up not wearing it but replaced it with a t-shirt, which he wrapped around his head and face.
RC …, who works as a delivery man for "Pizza-Pros", arrived at … Paddy Dobbin Drive at approximately 2:25 a.m.. Since there were no lights on at the residence, RC proceeded to check the area. As he approached the house, he heard someone from behind say "we'll take that". RCs thought it was a prank and said, "You'll actually stealing a pizza"? The two men then said, "Give us the fucking pizza". At this point, RC realized the seriousness of the situation and handed the pizza over to Jeffrey Aylward and RR. Both RR and Jeffrey Aylward held their weapons in full view of RC. Although he was not injured in any way, RC felt threatened during this encounter. Jeffrey Aylward and RR then returned to … Paddy Dobbin Drive, and the pizza was eaten by all in the group except AH, who had since gone to bed.
The Royal Newfoundland Constabulary were notified at 2:25 a.m. of the robbery. With the use of a police dog, Jeffrey Aylward and RR were tracked to … Paddy Dobbin Drive. The police approached the residence and asked to speak to the owner. MR came forward and agreed to let the officers look around. The weapons, masks, and pizza box were recovered. A warrant to search was executed at 7:35 a.m. and the masks, weapons, and pizza box were seized.
MR, RR, and Jeffrey Aylward gave cautioned statements to the police, admitting to their involvement. RL, AH, SM, MJ and AH also cooperated with the investigation by providing statements.
The appeal decision summarised the sentence as follows, at paragraph two:
2 In addition to the statutorily prescribed conditions, the respondent was ordered to,
- Abstain from the taking or consumption of alcohol or other intoxicating substance.
- Abstain from the taking or consumption of drugs except in accordance with a medical prescription.
- Abstain from owning or carrying a weapon, ammunition or explosive substance.
- Perform 200 hours of community service work over 12 months.
- Attend and participate actively in such awareness or educational programs or counselling sessions to which you might be referred by your probation officer, and in particular any relating to alcohol, drug or substance abuse or addiction, and anger management and control.
- Write a letter of apology to [RC].
On the appeal, the court decided in part:
11 Nevertheless, we are in full agreement with the Crown's second submission. It has been likewise expressed in all of the above cases that because a conditional sentence is "a sentence of imprisonment" (s. 742.1(a)) which is being served "in the community" (s. 742.1(b)), it is appropriate that there be some restrictions on the liberty of the offender during the period of such imprisonment. Otherwise, it obviously would not be imprisonment and would not be distinguishable from a probation order. In our view, while such a condition is not a mandatory condition under the legislation, only in the rarest of cases should there be no such restriction. [Emphasis added]
12 As has already been stated, the offences of which the respondent had been convicted are most serious ones. The surrounding circumstances and, in particular, the transition of what appears to have started out as a drunken prank conceived on the spur of the moment by a bunch of 18 year olds, into a criminal offence, nevertheless justify a sentence of only one year's imprisonment, to be served in the community. However, the nature of that offence is not, in our view, properly reflected without a limitation on the liberty of the respondent and the trial judge was in error in not doing so. We therefore intend to additionally impose such a condition.
13 In the result therefore, leave to appeal is granted and the appeal is allowed in part in that, in addition to the conditions imposed by the trial judge, the respondent, for the remainder of the conditional sentence period, will be confined to his place of residence from 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., except where it is necessary to leave such residence for the purpose of compliance with other conditions imposed by the trial judge and this Court; to continue attending school; to have no contact with the other persons involved in the offence; and, to have no contact with the complainant or his place of business. Additionally, following the serving of the sentence prescribed herein, the respondent will be subject to a probation order for a period of two years. … [Emphasis added]
-srbp-
A company from the Irving Group has won a government contract to design a ferry for the Newfoundland and Labrador ferry system.
According to a provincial government news release, Fleetway Inc. came out on top in an expressions of interest process begun this past May.
The release is unusually brief, does not provide any details on the company and erroneously describes it as a Newfoundland and Labrador company.
The original news release announcing the process contained much the same information as the announcement that Fleetway got the job.
-srbp-
There is disquiet in the sleepy hamlet of Gander.
The provincial courthouse is short one judge since Judge David Peddle was appointed to the Trials Division of the Supreme Court last December.
Justice Peddle’s former bench-mate - Judge Bruce Short – is on something of a work-to-rule, as it seems, to protest the delay in appointing someone to help with the load of cases parading before him in the Gander courthouse.
Court is held only on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays, with Judge Short repairing the rest of the time to his home, which is, it should be noted noted, more than the maximum 70 kilometres from his bench required by the statute.
One wonders what might happen if no one can rouse the appropriate authorities to fill the spot in Gander not to mention the other three seats on the provincial court bench that currently sit vacant.
Perhaps Judge Short might be compelled to start tossing cases out the door based on delays in hearing them and the resultant constitutional issues arising.
Bond Papers discussed this earlier in “Rumpole and the Blind Tasting”, “Rumpole and the Minister’s Choice” and “Rumpole and the Doddering Old Man”.
The politicos tried to push the whole thing off as a failure of the selection committee, but that story turned out to be a bit of a nose puller.
Whatever the reason, Gander is experiencing a summer of discontent in 2009 with a very special cause.
It will carry on, one suspects, until someone manages to get a few names in front of Tom Marshall the next time he comes into the office from his home in Corner Brook.
-srbp-
Air Labrador will be cutting its service to the southern coast of Labrador shortly.
The company will announce the cut within the next 30 days, including determining the date on which the service will end.
That’s what Air Labrador’s Philip Earle told CBC in a broadcast interview. Earle said the company couldn’t make a “business case” for continuing operations in the region. The company will continue to provide medical evacuation service to the local health region under its current contract.
This is the second cut by Air Labrador in 2009. In March, the company stopped flying Dash-8s and laid off 100 people.
-srbp-
[Originally posted as "Strong language welcome...sometimes"]
Today he’s the interim child and youth advocate but a decade ago, then-Provincial Court Judge John Rorke was facing disciplinary action for remarks at a sentencing for armed robbery.
Justice Robert Wells - appointed to review the complaint - decided that Rorke’s language at the sentencing was “inappropriate”. As the Telegram reported it at the time,
Inappropriateness occurred at two levels, Wells wrote. "Firstly, a judge should not use unacceptable language in the course of judicial duties. Expressions such as 'haven't got a pot to piss in' are simply unacceptable when coming from a presiding judge, as are personal references such as 'I've had a dozen beer in me, a good many times.'"
Rorke also observed that the young man, who had robbed a pizza delivery man at a house on Paddy Dobbin Drive in the east end of St. John’s, had placed the Crown and the judge in a bind with respect to sentencing.
The young man was handed a 12 month conditional sentence, as opposed to the three years which Rorke said in his decision was more typical for the offence under the circumstances.
"So, the next guy I got to look at and say three years is going to throw back at me, 'Oh yeah, you let the rich boys go because they are your buddies, they are your friends. There's no justice here.' That's the jam you put me in. That's the jam you put the Crown in," he said.
The young man at the original criminal trial was represented by Danny Williams and his law partner Steve Marshall.
Williams told the Telegram in 1999 he had no problem with Rorke’s language if it worked to “save a soul”. Williams did subsequently take umbrage at strong language from another judge in Ruelokke v. Newfoundland and Labrador aimed at actions to which Williams was a party.
Rorke was reprimanded by the disciplinary review.
-srbp-
Most people will see a nice campaign-style picture featuring the current Prime Minister.
Day One: the observation.
Day Two: the confirmation.
The whole thing couldn’t have been any funnier if your humble e-scribbler had advance knowledge of the government’s news release schedule.
-srbp-
From the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board:
The Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board is inviting public comment on the draft Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) for the Southern Newfoundland area of the Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Area.
The Southern Newfoundland area is included in the C-NLOPB’s Call for Bids, and the bids for this area close on November 19. The results of the SEA will be considered in decisions relating to the potential issuance of exploration licences.
The Board is conducting the SEA for the Southern Newfoundland Offshore Area with the assistance of a working group with representatives from federal and provincial government departments and agencies, One Ocean, the Fish, Food and Allied Workers Union, local Regional Economic Development Boards, and non-governmental organizations, and has engaged an environmental consulting firm to prepare the associated SEA report. The Board has received a draft SEA report from the consultant and now is soliciting public comment on that document.
The draft SEA Report may be viewed on the Board’s Web site at www.cnlopb.nl.ca or by e-mailing a request to information@cnlopb.nl.ca.
Written public comments on the draft SEA report will be accepted by the Board until noon on September 16, 2009.
Comments can be sent to Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board, 5th Floor, TD Place, 140 Water Street, St. John's NL, A1C 6H6, 709-778-1400; or via email to ead@cnlopb.nl.ca.
-30-
Beloit College has just released its most recent edition of the Mindset List, that marvellous compendium of things the incoming class of university freshmen understand as having always been true.
-srbp-