The Premier’s daughter tweeted this comment last Wednesday night.
Few people consider the impact that political life has on the families of politicians and political staffers. Steve Paikin’s book The Dark Side deals with it, as SRBP noted in 2006.
That tweet is a reminder of that.
Here’s some advice for the Premier’s daughter from an old political hand.
As if the week hasn’t been going badly enough for her, Premier Kathy Dunderdale decided to make it all the worse on Thursday with her scrum about her Twitter account.
Here’s what we have learned:
What was the tragedy of the orchestrated political lynching of an innocent member of the House of Assembly by the provincial Conservatives has now turned to farce.
On Tuesday, Premier Kathy Dunderdale was on her high horse: Conservative members of the House of Assembly "understand very well how Facebook works," Dunderdale told reporters outside the House of Assembly, “and as an MHA, when you're on Facebook, when you're engaged in Twitter, then you have to have an obligation to pay attention."
Neither Dunderdale nor several of her colleagues apparently were paying attention.
The Conservatives in Newfoundland and Labrador are politically deaf. They only hear themselves.
Former fisheries minister Trevor Taylor used his Telegram column on Monday to issue a few hypocritical tut tuts about the state of public discussion in the province.
Too negative he whined, sounding for all the world like someone was holding a small dog turd under his nose as he typed. His political pals on da Twitter chimed in as they are programmed to do.
Shortly after 1:30, government house leader Darin King rose in the House on a point of order. He wanted the Speaker to suspend Gerry Rogers from the House of Assembly not for something Rogers said or even endorsed but merely because her name appeared on a group critical of government on which some moron had posted threats against the Premier.
The Tories sealed the triple play when Speaker Ross Wiseman ruled that while there was no evidence on the face of it that Rogers was guilty of endorsing the threats, he would invent a reason to condemn her anyway.
They are blind, too.
The provincial Conservatives could haul in up to $7.7 million through a new tax on telephones to be introduced ostensibly to pay for province-wide 911 emergency service, municipal affairs minister Kevin “Fairity” O’Brien announced on Tuesday.
According to the official backgrounder, the provincial government will introduce a new tax of “less than one dollar per month” on every landline and cellular telephone in the province. At a news conference, O’Brien and fire and emergency services boss Mike Samson estimated there were upwards of 650,000 phones in the province.
Although the release describes the approach as a “cost-recovery” model, neither O’Brien nor Samson would estimate the annual cost of operating the system.
Other provinces use the same approach. PEI charges 70 cents per telephone or working line while Nova Scotia charges less than 50 cents. Quebec, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and New Brunswick also tax telephones to pay for 911 service.
-srbp-
Cleaning out the home office has turned up a few forgotten gems.
One of them related to the political impact of open line shows in the province. Last week, your humble e-scribbler moderated a lunch-time talk by Professor Alex Marland and Randy Simms on just that topic. The pile of papers included a Canadian Press story that appeared some time in early May, 2008.
Headlined “Williams lashes out against accusations of tight message control”, the story was Danny Williams’; reactions to comments during the Cameron Inquiry by John Abbott, the former deputy minister of health and community services.
Newfoundland [sic] Premier Danny Williams says a former public servant made "offensive and stupid" remarks when he told a public inquiry that radio call-in shows influenced the government's handling of an emerging scandal involving flawed breast-cancer testing.
Even at the worst of their leadership feuding Jean Chretien and Paul Martin never frigged each other over the way Kathy Dunderdale and Jerome Kennedy did last week.
What is a “compelling argument”, you might ask?
No one knows.
We already knew that the provincial cabinet had abandoned their budget before the document had been debated in the House. That happened last week when the Premier ordered the justice minister and the attorney general to abandon the cabinet-approved cuts in the justice department.
Less than 12 hours after meeting with the same officials justice minister Darin King consulted before cabinet approved the cuts, King and attorney general Tom Marshall (right, not exactly as illustrated) told reporters that whatever those officials had said would now be the policy.
The change of policy is breathtaking enough. Not only will some of the laid-off court security officers be rehired, but cabinet has also lifted the hiring freeze to allow the High Sheriff to immediately hire more staff. Someone will also be appointed to conduct operational reviews of the three departments – High Sheriff, legal aid and Crown prosecution service – involved in the cabinet flip flop.
But that’s not the truly striking aspect of this abrupt change.
International Association of Business Communicators (Newfoundland and Labrador) presents a professional development luncheon:
According to Statistics Canada (2007), Newfoundlanders and Labradorians listen to more talk radio than any other provincial group of Canadians.
Is it a useful communications tool for community engagement and the sharing of local information or is it just bantering?
Join IABC NL for lunch and an interesting and interactive open panel discussion on Talk Radio in Newfoundland and Labrador.
Randy Simms, retired Open Line host, Dr. Alex Marland, Associate Professor (Political Science) Memorial University, and moderator Ed Hollett discuss the pros and cons of Talk Radio.
When: Thursday, April 11, 2013, 12:00 - 2:00 p.m.
Where: Capital Hotel, 208 Kenmount Rd., St John’sRegister: Online – http://iabcapril.eventbrite.com/
Email – eventsiabcnl@gmail.com$50.00 – IABC Members
$75.00 – non-members.
-srbp-
Over at cbc.ca/nl, John Gushue has an excellent column on the recent prosperity, in particular the apparent contradiction between a supposedly booming economy and the government cuts or the sense some people have that they aren’t part of the boom.
Take some time and go read John’s observations, if you haven’t already. You will always be rewarded by John’s accessible style that reveals some very sharp insights.
For all that, though, there’s a sense that there’s something missing from Gushue’s column. The piece gets right up to the edge and then just doesn’t bring the thing to a satisfying conclusion.
Never fear.
The relentless labradore fills in the bit John missed.
Only a few days ago, natural resources minister Tom Marshall was telling us that the Premier was an Iron Lady. A compassionate one, mind you, but an Iron Lady, nonetheless.
Firm in her decisions.
Unyielding under pressure.
Tom was telling us that Kathy Dunderdale and Margaret Thatcher were made of the same stuff.
What?
No.
Tom was not drunk.
No. He was not stoned, either.
And it was not April Fool’s.
Knock it off and keep reading.
Twice last week, provincial Conservative politicians offered unprompted endorsements of Kathy Dunderdale’s leadership.
Natural resources minister Tom Marshall praised her as a compassionate Iron Lady who had his full support. Here’s the story VOCM ran:
Natural Resources Minister Tom Marshall says the premier has his full and complete support. Kathy Dunderdale has come under fire for a tough, cost-cutting budget that includes widespread layoffs and funding cuts. On VOCM Open Line with Bill Rowe, Marshall used a label which came into prominence during the term of former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. Thatcher came into power in the UK in 1970s and developed a reputation of being tough and uncompromising during a time of economic recession, earning the title "Iron Lady". Marshall says Dunderdale is also an Iron Lady, but one with compassion.
Meanwhile, Steve Kent – noteworthy in the past for his lack of Dunderlove – had this to say [via CBC and labradore]:
"Premier Dunderdale is a compassionate and principle-centered leader. I remain inspired by her vision and strength," Kent wrote.
…
Kent added that Dunderdale enjoys the full support of the PC caucus.
The SIDI simulation of government spending that we’ve run this past week might not be everyone’s cup of tea, but these sort of thought exercises are always useful.
The most striking thing is the amount of money from oil and mining that the provincial government has spent in the past seven years: $15.6 billion. That’s enough to wipe out the entire public debt plus the unfunded pension liability and have a couple of billion left over for an unprecedented capital works program.
It’s a staggering amount of money and the only thing more amazing than how much money there was is how easy it was to do something far more productive than just spending all the money, as the current provincial government has done.
The SIDI simulation included:
The only thing needed to make the simulation a reality was a political desire to do it. Had the provincial government done any one of the elements of the SIDI approach, then the provincial government could have either avoided the current crisis altogether or significantly altered the profile of the crisis and the prospects for coping with it.
The long-run target is to bring the province’s net per capita debt gradually down to the all-province level within ten years.Locke made it clear in another part of his March 25 memo to finance minister Jerome Kennedy that the purpose of any surpluses the provincial government achieves within the next decade will be to fund Muskrat Falls.
You don’t need drugs or alcohol to get the feeling of dizziness or stupor like you smacked your head with a hammer. Hard. Repeatedly.
Just listen to a representative of one of the special interest groups talking about the provincial budget and public spending. It doesn’t matter which one. As your humble e-scribbler was finishing off this post on Tuesday, a representative of the appropriately named St. John’s BOT was on television talking about how government had to cut public sector jobs and tear into public sector pension benefits because of the hideous unfunded pension liability.
Corporate lawyer Denis Mahoney even quoted the distorted, misleading government claim about the unfunded liability as a share of only a fraction of the public debt to bolster his position. He never mentioned the billions going to subsidize his members, of course.
In the process, Mahoney looked about as convincing as the labour mouthpieces like the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives who said in 2004 that the government wasn’t spending too much. It just didn’t have enough money. Of course, they never mentioned that the government was outspending just about every other province on a per capita basis.
Listen to this sort of mindless crap long enough and you don’t have to wonder why people wander around in a daze.
To clear your head, take a look at a chart showing the actual government spending from 2005 to 2012 (in blue) compared to the income from sources other than oil and minerals (in red).
The number is a hard one to wrap your mind around.
$15.6 billion.
That’s the amount of oil royalties and mining royalties the provincial government collected from 2005 to 2012.
Once you think you have that figure in your mind and understand what it means, think about this: with the exception of about $1.4 billion, the money is apparently gone.
Spent.
Never to come again.
If you want to understand how the provincial government got itself into the mess, just think about all that money. Newfoundland and Labrador is a “have” province with a government that is laying people off and cutting programs. Then realize that for all that cutting the government is still planning to spend upwards of a half a billion dollars a year more than it is taking in.
The idea is staggering.
Well, be prepared to be floored completely.
One of the greatest political frauds committed by the current administration and its supporters is the idea that they have lowered the public debt.
All the politicians say it.
Wade Locke, their tireless economist, talks about the same thing – net debt – in his soon-to-be-infamous memo to Jerome Kennedy.
Talk of the net debt, reducing net debt, and having a net debt reduction strategy is nothing but a monstrous deception of the public.
