“Williams bough[t] it hook line and sinker. He threw his considerable political machine behind the Federal Conservatives.”
Extract from a entry in the journal of the main local traitor brander
Smack in the middle of a post about the supposed accuracy of Senator George Baker’s comments on separation comes this comment from the blog author.
According to this blog that need not be named, in 2005, Danny Williams supported Stephen Harper based on the “it” in that quote, namely the promise to remove all non-renewable resources from the Equalization calculation. Then Harper reneged and the rest is history. Among the League of Professional Victims, this episode has become yet another one of the grievances – more fantasy, fiction and invention than reality – that fuels their daily angst.
That was the point of the post which claims that baker is “telling it like it is.”
Now it’s not like the political problems with this Equalization fiddle weren’t fairly obvious to anyone familiar with the issues. Or for that matter for anyone surrounded by a bunch of expert policy people all of whom were familiar with the whole thing.
And it’s not like a majority of Newfoundlanders and Labradorians voted for Harper in 2005 despite the workings of the “considerable political machine.” They saw through the whole thing from the beginning, apparently.
But despite all that, this fellow who usually says the Premier is always right contends that Danny Williams – super-lawyer, wonder negotiator, walker on water, bender of spoons - was duped.
Fooled.
Taken for a ride.
Played for a patsy.
He was a sucker.
He was outsmarted, outwitted, bamboozled, hoodwinked.
By Stephen Harper.
Of all people.
Yes, according to the province’s chief quisling hunter and boffo rally organizer, Danny Williams was Stephen Harper’s bitch.
Okay.
If Stephen Harper could con Danny Williams, who else has done it?
-srbp-
