… you launch your election campaign at at huge fundraiser and your signature policy announcement gets slaughtered on Twitter within seconds of the words leaving your lips.
Yes, friends, Paul Davis told the world he will create some kind of savings fund from oil royalties.
In 2021.
If, and only if, they can manage to balance the books by then.
And of course, only if Paul and/or the humourously named Conservatives can get re-elected not once but twice between now and then.
A number of people pointed that out immediately on Twitter on Wednesday night.
The real political division in society is between authoritarians and libertarians.
Showing posts with label Dunphy shooting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dunphy shooting. Show all posts
24 April 2015
09 April 2015
The irresponsible rush to judgment #nlpoli
For those not involved but deeply concerned about the events in Mitchell’s Brook on Easter Sunday, one of the more disturbing aspects of the Dunphy shooting has been the ease with which a relatively small number of people have taken up sides on the shooting without much in the way of evidence.
The rush to judgment has been equally easy both for those unduly keen to declare the shooting was “by the book” as for those who see the shooting as a political assassination, murder of an injured worker, or a sign of what will come under the federal government’s controversial anti-terror legislation.
At the same time, official sources have decided to say very little. They shouldn’t discuss the subject of the investigation itself. That would be inappropriate and both the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police have shut down any extraneous information. The only official comment is coming from the detachment handling the investigation.
The official vacuum extends much winder than it should though. There’s a complete absence of factual information about the type of investigation, its scope, or the actors involved in this incident. Basic information would kill off most of the commentary out there coming from all sides.
The result is that the public is misinformed. They aren’t getting a full picture.
The rush to judgment has been equally easy both for those unduly keen to declare the shooting was “by the book” as for those who see the shooting as a political assassination, murder of an injured worker, or a sign of what will come under the federal government’s controversial anti-terror legislation.
At the same time, official sources have decided to say very little. They shouldn’t discuss the subject of the investigation itself. That would be inappropriate and both the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police have shut down any extraneous information. The only official comment is coming from the detachment handling the investigation.
The official vacuum extends much winder than it should though. There’s a complete absence of factual information about the type of investigation, its scope, or the actors involved in this incident. Basic information would kill off most of the commentary out there coming from all sides.
The result is that the public is misinformed. They aren’t getting a full picture.
Tags:
Dunphy shooting
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)