Fire-truck month is not quite over.
-srbp-
15 September 2009
Pushing buttons: technology and campaigns
While most candidates in the St. John’s municipal election have embraced some form of technology to support their campaign, the level of usage and the sophistication varies widely.
On one end of the spectrum you’ve got Ward Three candidate Bruce Tilley and his Web 0.5 beta site that looks like it was left over from the days when the Internet ran on vacuum tubes.
There’s no one who has fully embraced Web Campaign 2.0, but some are pretty close.
Like Shannie Duff and Simon Lono. Both have the social media add-ons like Twitter and they update them frequently. Both are also using videos through youtube to help spread their views.
Those are just two; their are others like Sheilagh O’Leary or Debbie Hanlon who are making maximum use of the facebook space to keep their network of dedicated supporters informed an up-to-date.
Others have got the look down, but the content is lacking, like any of the mayoral contenders or Keith Coombs.
Doc O’Keefe has a really expensive electronic brochure but then again that’s what you get when you hire an advertising agency. It’s all non-threatening designer beige and even the photos of the candidate are retouched packages of pure crud.
Human beings simply do not look like this. Borg have healthier skin tones. There’s a calculated effort here to be inoffensive but the effect is so calculated and so miserably executed that it comes off being offensive and obnoxious.
Ron Ellsworth’s site looks good, but there are some inconsistencies in the content that mar the overall package. He has a section called “My approach” and the sub-headings are about “Our” this and that. There are plenty of these jarring internal contradictions in Ellsworth’s campaign. Think a plan where the first action item is to develop a plan. Altogether, these suggest Ellsworth hasn’t got his political shit together or his campaign team is so inexperienced or otherwise incapable that they can’t get a bit of focus to the message.
Take Twitter as another example. Ron’s got it, but one suspects he’s got it because someone told him that’s what campaigns need to look good. But Twitter is the sort of thing that hyper-caffeinated hamster people with crackberries use to keep people notified of the bathroom habits or random firings of the few synapses left in their brains. Some of them are so wired they are proof a monkey can sometimes luck out and type a coherent sentence with just their thumbs.
Okay, so that’s a bit of an exaggeration.
But when a guy uses Twitter like a stone tablet in cuneiform – google it, people on your iPhone - you know that Ellsworth can talk about engaging people but he has no idea how to actually do it.
But if you want to get a taste for raw energy and the sort of straight-up presentation the Web 2.0 technology can deliver, check out Lono’s virtual door-to-doors.
Specifically have a look at the one on community, taxes and services. It should raise a few hackles but it speaks very loudly and very deliberately to a raft of voters in the west end of St. John’s. Curb-side recycling is funny but the humour is an entree to a simple message about the need to just get on with better waste management.
The two that are getting the most attention are two you might expect to, though. Bally Hally speaks directly to an election issue and one that will face the next council. Lono makes his position clear. Lono’s call for a municipal auditor general seems to have struck a nerve with people too, if the number of visitors is any indication.
There are plenty of ways to use technology in political campaigns. You can see the full spectrum in the St. John’s municipal race.
-srbp-
Half-million in free money for local business
Called a contribution, $500,000 handed out today to a local offshore supply and service company from the provincial government doesn’t have to be repaid.
The criteria for getting the cash are, in a word, vague.
The promotional material talks about technology transfer and large-scale local enterprises. The actual eligibility criteria are much less stringent. The job creation and other benefits to flow from the project are – in the words of the business department – required to be merely “incremental”.
-srbp-
Way less for way more in Lewisporte
While everyone is talking about the removal of laboratory and x-ray services from Lewisporte, a much larger cut seems to have escaped public attention.
The proposed redevelopment of the chronic care centre at North haven Manor was supposed to include acute care facilities as well. The original budgeted cost was $20 million.
When people started to complain about the lab and x-ray business, the initial government response from no less a personage than the local member of the legislature was that people should be mindful of the $30 million health centre that was coming to town.
Now a 50% cost over-run sounded bad enough, the more accurate version of the whole story is found in the local newspaper – the Lewisporte Packet – from August 12.
Turns out that the original concept had ballooned in cost to $42 million. Not so much as a single shovel had been soiled by local mud and the thing had jumped 110% in cost. The provincial government’s response was to hack out most if not all of the acute care facilities, bringing the cost down to the low 30s.
"The one-roof health facility project was estimated to be around $20 million. It escalated to be about $40 million, in fact over $40 million," Mr. Oram explained. "As a government we had to look at where our priorities lie and we had to prioritize based on the identified needs.
"The project is still going to be - from our estimates - around $30 million for North Haven Manor and some other components as well. There's no way to keep it under $30 million to do what we want to do there and to meet the needs that we see as being in the Lewisporte area - this is the amount of money we are going to have to spend to do it."
The slash to laboratory and x-ray facilities was on top of that $12 million cut.
If all that weren’t bad enough, the story is already widening.
Health minister Paul Oram is taking it in the head for the way the information on the x-ray and lab changes was released in the first place, let alone the way the new information flopped out last Friday.
The letters released last Friday have given risen to concerns in other communities that cuts are coming there as well. But even in trying to allay concerns, the health minister just made matters worse: all health regions were asked to identify cuts, according to Oram.
Now what he said is absolutely true but in the context, he is only adding gasoline to his own backside. In his initial bluster, Oram stated clearly that further changes – always read as cuts – are coming.
-srbp-
Related: “Much less for may more for St. Anthony”
Reaping the wind
A little over a year after the contract was awarded, Technip and StatoilHydro have launched the first floating wind turbine offshore Norway.
The turbine has a reported capacity of 2.3 megawatts in its location 10 kilometres out to sea.
The 315 megawatt project is expected to be in service by 2011.
-srbp-
The joy of accountability
Here’s a picture of a government being held accountable for its actions.
It could be subtitled: “How I spent my summer vacation.”
There are a few things to notice here.
First of all, there are thousands of pages of documents made public in response to questions asked by members of the national legislature.
It’s part of what they get paid to do, asking questions and it’s part of what the government gets paid to do: answer them.
Second of all, in Ottawa they still use the time-honoured tradition of questions on the order paper. These are inquiries into government decisions or policies that are posed in order to elicit as full and complete a response as possible. They are done free of charge, unlike ATIPs which carry costs.
In the 1980s, the Peckford crew kept the House closed so much they essentially forced the opposition to use freedom of information laws to get what they should have obtained for free in the House.
In the Tobin era, the members of the whole House came to the conclusion they should do away with order paper questions for most things. All in the House were more comfortable with that situation and evidently some of them needed more time to file expense claims.
That tradition continues such that the opposition in Newfoundland and Labrador doesn’t get to use the order paper as it is supposed to be used, they get fewer sitting days in the legislature to pose the questions they might pose in the first place, and then to make it worse, they have to submit access to information requests and pay for them out of the budget which the government deliberately keeps tight.
Talk about setting up a system that restricts the flow of information and thereby hampers accountability. Let’s not even get into the issue of how the government answers – or to be correct - tires desperately not to answer simple questions, regardless of who is posing them.
But don’t worry about that.
Just look at the mound of information the government had to cough up.
Would that governments that talked a good game on accountability could actually deliver in proportion to their self-congratulatory rhetoric.
-srbp-
14 September 2009
There are no coincidences, Northern Peninsula version
No connection.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Click the picture to get the online version of the story.
-srbp-
Much less for way more in St. Anthony
Costs for a new sports and conference centre for St. Anthony have already jumped 70% over the original budget and no one has even broken ground on the new Polar Centre yet.
In January 2007, the new centre was estimated to cost $5.676 million. By May, 2009, the project was estimated to cost $9.557 million.
But here’s the thing: the higher cost facility will actually be a fraction of the original project.
In 2007, the new facility was supposed to include an arena seating “1,295 people, a conference centre, an indoor walking track, and will provide the necessary amenities to enable the town to host significant conferences, trade shows and other events.”
The centre announced on Monday by no less a personage than the Premier himself will house only 540 spectators and won’t have any of the conference and trade show facilities.
The Premier was in St. Anthony to announce that tenders would be called shortly for site preparation on the new arena which will be tacked onto a brand new multi-million school housing students from kindergarten to Grade 12. Total estimated cost for the combined project is $28 million.
For those who might think the Polar Centre is still alive, guess again. The town council still has a news release trumpeting the 1295 seat arena, but a news story in the latest Northern Pen puts it all in order:
To avoid excess engineering work the province plans to select an existing plan for one of the many K-12's built around the province in recent years. That plan would be modified to allow the school to connect to the proposed Polar Centre and to fit other local concerns.
But even the new construction project doesn’t mean the arena will have all the amenities announced on Monday:
Mayor [Boyd] Noel warned that the facility council wanted to build would have cost $15-16 million and because it's only been approved for $10-million by the province there will be significant cutbacks. One of those cutbacks is the possible loss of a planned walking track around the arena.
-srbp-
13 September 2009
Questions in search of answers
Just a few observations on announcements from the province’s health ministry lately.
1. labradore points out that others – like the local news media - are noticing the odd but telling similarity between the Lewisporte cuts announcement and the one from Eastern Health about breast cancer back in April.
So much for the story then and now that it was all up to the local health authority.
2. During Cameron, every senior government witness insisted that all the decisions were made by the people at the health authority because that’s what they do; ministers of health and cabinet did not get involved in operational issues.
Like say, deciding whether to shut down laboratory and x-ray services.
Who decided on an operational issue in the Lewisporte case?
Hint: it wasn’t the regional health authorities. They found out about the cut the morning it was announced.
3. And how many times will a cabinet minister refer to the recommendations of the Cameron Inquiry in trying to justify the operational decision made in Lewisporte?
4. Then there’s the claim by no less a personage than the Premier that the cuts came from the health authorities and that it was aimed at improving the system.
He claims the health authority made a recommendation “to us” for services that should be cut.
He leaves out the important bit, of course, that the health authority didn’t come up with this idea on their own. They suggested cuts only when prompted by a request from the health department to suggest cuts in the first place.
And the cuts had nothing to do with either offsetting the cost of the health centre in Lewisporte (as the Friday release claims) or “improving” the system.
That’s plain from the letters released by government late on Friday.
But don’t take my word for it: Read them for yourself.
5. And since we are in the questioning mood: why would a provincial government that is evidently flush with billions in loose change ask for recommendations on what to cut from health budgets in the first place, especially when the sum finally settled on by - whom? cabinet, the Premier, definitely Paul Oram – was such a measly, miserable amount?
And that’s based on nothing more than the general political principle that you just don’t go out and randomly shoot off a body part when you don’t need to.
Cuts make people upset.
Cuts to health care make lots of people really upset.
Burn ‘em at the stake kinda upset.
And they don’t get un-upset easily.
Un-upsetting them will be costly either in blood and/or treasure: cash or in political strips taken off someone’s hide.
Therefore, as the political wisdom would suggest: do NOT cut health care unless it is absolutely necessary.
So why in the name of all that is political and therefore unholy would any cabinet in its right mind ask health regions to recommend a list of slashes, some of them valued at upwards of a million bucks.
6. When did they make the decisions? Observers of government will note the date on the letters released on Friday is from early 2009, well into the budget cycle and long after decisions would normally be made. People will start asking hard questions about when all this was decided. Evidently it wasn’t in August.
7. There is no plan. And when all that is done, ask yourself why a government department would release letters that show their initial talking points were more composed at the Mad hatter’s tea party?
Usually you release evidence that backs your claim, not further hints that – contrary to the Premier’s claims at the bored of trayed last week - people in the departments of government have no idea what they are doing.
-srbp-
Duff points out obvious: Keith Coombs has no cred on city finances
Okay, right off the bat there has to be the fairly obvious point: the guy who oversaw the Mile One stadium money pit and has been known to talk about surpluses that turned into horrendous deficits is not a guy with a huge amount of credibility when it comes to numbers anyway.
If Keith Coombs said one plus one is two, most people in St. John’s would run it through the calculator just to check.
Anyway, Shannie Duff is quite rightly pointing out that challenger Keith Coombs claim that there is a $44 million surplus in the municipal budget is “unsubstantiated”.
But here’s the thing Shannie: Coomb’s claim is not irresponsible. It is total typical Keith Coombs fiscal bullshit.
Call it what it is: bullshit. When people hear “Keith Coombs” they already think “crap” right away. It’s Pavlovian. So don’t be coy and polite. Call a spade a spade: Keith Coombs is full of fiscal crap. People will cheer your unbridled honesty.
Anyway, here’s Duff’s version:
Duff says Coombs’ $44 Million Tax Claim Irresponsible
Deputy Mayor candidate Shannie Duff says her opponent's claim that the City of St. John's expects a total surplus of $44 million over the next four years is "unsubstantiated." "Does it really exist?" asks Duff.
On Friday Ms. Duff met with the City's comptroller to discuss Keith Coomb's claim that the city expects annual tax surpluses of $11 million per year for the next four years.
Mr. Coombs has based a promise to vote against any increase in taxation, according to his website, "without impacting on the level of services offered."
"The forecast of a tax surplus appears to be based on an internal planning document which made several significant assumptions which Mr. Coombs has conveniently chosen to ignore" says Duff. "The internal document assumes the City's current level of expenditures remains constant, but we know there are negotiated payroll increases coming, we know all of the bids for our tenders are coming back in excess of the money we have budgeted, and we have to account for inflation" notes Duff.
The significant cost of curb side recycling program scheduled to be introduced next year is not part of the expenditure forecast in the internal document. "What is Mr. Coombs going to do about that? Cut it?" asks Duff.
Shannie Duff says Mr. Coombs' promise is "old politics at its worst. For a candidate who keeps talking about going forward, Keith Coombs is campaigning like a relic from the past."
- 30 -
Shannie's Statement from the Rogers Candidates Forum
I think most voters would agree that what a politician does is more important that what a politician says.
I am proud of my record at City Hall. Whether the issue has been protection of our environment, affordable housing, social justice, or support for neighbourhood groups I have been there.
I have also been a voice for a balanced approach to planning and development. We have to find a balance between growth and protecting the social, cultural, and heritage assets that make St. John's a creative and livable city.
What do I mean by balance?
I support good development that is appropriate for its location
I support change when it is in the public interest.
I support fairness in dealing with development applications.
I supported 1.6 billion dollars of development in St. John's since 2001.There is a difference between my opponent and I. I don't want just any development. I want good development.
My opponent is also promising to give back to taxpayers $44 million over the next four years. Does this surplus really exist?
My opponent's claim is based on a preliminary internal document developed to assist staff with budget preparations.
The document's assumptions do not include any provision for a reduction of high property tax assessments if people appeal (as they will).
It does not include the start up costs for Robin Hood Bay or the new sewerage treatment plant.
There is no provision for inflation for providing our existing services, and we know all of our tenders have come back at prices over our estimates.
I think Council will cut the mill rate, but who ho has a crystal ball to predict a surplus four years out? City staff told Council that this forecast was very preliminary, based on some major assumptions, and not for public release. Perhaps if my opponent had attended any meetings of the Finance committee or the Internal Audit committee he would have known this.
My opponent isn't the first politician to promise to cut taxes during an election. It is easy to say.
I say, judge me on my record. Judge me on what I have done.
If you share my passion for this wonderful city of ours, then I ask you for your support, again, and I thank you.
-srbp-
The Cruel Shoes
The picture says it all.
Suddenly, Jack Layton is suddenly not so keen on an election. He’s talking about making parliament work, about working with the Connies. You know, the sort of stuff Jack and his householders used to chide the Grits over.
An unusually media-skittish Mr. Layton said little Saturday during an event in Toronto, but what he did say lowered the temperature somewhat.
“I think that everybody involved would want to see us co-operate in the House of Commons and get some results for people — especially those that are struggling right now: the unemployed and people being left behind,” Mr. Layton said as he inched away from reporters at an archway opening in Toronto.
“So that's going to remain our preoccupation.”
Looks like the real preoccupation will be getting the shoe that’s on the other foot out of Jack’s ass. Hint: it went in via the mouth while he was shooting it off before.
-srbp-
12 September 2009
Megamania: NL falls farther behind in wind energy development
While it has huge potential in wind energy, Newfoundland and Labrador currently has less than 60 megawatts in production or in development.
There are no plans for more and the province’s 2007 energy plan places tight restrictions on development of any additional wind energy. The plan talks about potential but ensures that there is little chance the potential will be developed.
For electricity, the energy plan is focused on development of the Lower Churchill to the exclusion of all else.
As a rest of the political obsession with turf wars and 40 year old megaprojects, the province - already well back in the pack - is falling farther and farther behind in a race where it should be leading.
1. Hydro Quebec is pushing ahead with development of new energy technologies. It’s looking for 500 new megawatts of wind energy. That’s on top of existing projects and the ones in train.
Hydro-Québec has invited municipalities and native groups to compete for 500 megawatts of wind power contracts. Wind farms in the utility's third call for tenders must not exceed 25 megawatts.
The company’s strategic plan forecasts upwards of 4,000 megawatts of wind generation over the next four years.
2. Wolfe Island wind farm official opened. Canadian Hydro officially opened the Wolfe Island wind project this past week. The project is the second largest wind farm in Canada and generates slightly less than 200 megawatts.
3. Norway just installed the first floating turbine to harness offshore wind energy.
4. Work on a $1.5 billion offshore wind farm in Rhode Island is continuing apace.
-srbp-
From the rumour mill: municipal politics version
Stuff you hear around.
Could be real.
Could be something else.
You decide.
1. Win or lose – and more likely the latter than the former - Rompin’ Rip-Off Ronnie Ellsworth will ditch municipal politics to run in St. John’s North in the next provincial election.
The guy has made no secret of his aggressive ambitions that go all the way to being the second Cable Guy to occupy the Eighth Floor. Ever notice Ron’s love of words like “piece” and how he has tried to copy other aspects of his idol’s political approach?
Ronnie’s rapid rise – never more than 18 months in a political job - fits perfectly with the timetable to replace the geriatric Tory incumbent and then 18 months after that look to replace his political heartthrob.
2. Win or lose - again more likely the latter than the former - Keith Coombs will look to run in St. John’s West in the next provincial election when the geriatric Tory incumbent in that seat finally retires.
-srbp-
11 September 2009
From the rumour mill: electricity stuff you hear around town
A compendium of the stuff ordinary people have been saying.
Could be true.
Could be complete bullshit.
1. NALCO will have to do a major re-write on its Lower Churchill project to correct deficiencies. That’s what you get for relying on a decade old pile of paper.
2. Danny Williams’ attack on Hydro Quebec was a sign that his dream legacy project is screwed up royally, with little hope of ever being built no matter how long he stays in office.
3. The little hissy fit was a sign of his usual impulsive decision-making style. Williams was so pissed by Russell Wangersky’s column in the weekend Telegram that Williams had to stick a denial into his speech at the board of trade.
4. Williams will use his hissy fit as the excuse when the re-write comes. He’ll claim there is some sort of plot or conspiracy aimed at keeping the Lower Churchill project from being built, while the real reason the project is screwed up is because of the way it’s being run. Williams is recycling excuses from decades ago but some people are ready to believe anything even after the government inked a deal in April that shows that Hydro Quebec can’t block the Pet Project.
-srbp-
10 September 2009
Hydro Quebec not an issue: Ed Martin
A few days before Danny Williams tried to blame Hydro-Quebec for delays and problems in the Lower Churchill project, NALCO chief executive Ed Martin was singing the same old song about what a great project he had and how any day now he’d be ready to start talking to prospective customers about a sale.
He’s been saying that for three years.
But here’s part of what you’ll find in the August 31 Toronto Star:
Martin doesn't see the Quebec issue as a major stumbling block, as regulation requires the province to allow access to its grid in return for a set tariff. Hydro Quebec and Nalcor are just working out the details.
That’s the exact opposite of the line Danny has been pushing for a week or so, now.
You can also notice in this piece that - according to Martin - the project will be financed at least in part by oil revenues. Some of those are flowing now from White Rose, but others won’t be along for the better part of the next decade.
Ed Martin is going to have to pull off some neat financial tricks if he plans to pay for a $10 to $14 billion project Danny Williams said will be pushing power in 2015 when the cash Martin is counting on won’t start showing up at his front door until around 2020.
But anyway…
Ed needs to talk to Danny or vice versa. Basically these guys are on two completely different pages about this project.
Then again, Danny and others seem to be on different pages quite a bit lately, including with himself over Hydro-Quebec and an ownership stake in the Lower Churchill.
Rest assured though, that as much as Danny Williams and his team appear to be all over the map, there is a piece of paper somewhere with the word plan written on the top of it.
At least that’s what he felt compelled to tell the local board of trade the other day after a local newspaper editor pointed out the decidedly errat…mercuri…caprici…ummm…errr… impulsive way the provincial government tends to be.
Well, he said “slaphappy” too, but let’s use impulsive because it is a bit friendlier than most of the words that come to mind.
-srbp-
Signing his own death warrant
Newfoundland and Labrador information commissioner Ed Ring is welcoming a court case that will settle once and for all a dispute with the provincial government over access to government records.
The provincial government is insisting Ring shouldn’t have access to documents as part of his review under the province’s open records law. That law currently gives Ring the powers of a commissioner under the public inquiries act to compel the delivery of any and all documents he deems relevant to discharging his responsibilities.
Now a judge will get to sort it out.
Of course, those of us who know Ed Ring personally wouldn’t expect anything from him but exactly this thoughtful and responsible discharge of his duties as set out by law.
Let’s just hope that if the judge sides with Ring, the powers that be don’t decide Ring must be replaced with someone considerably more pliable. it would be a shame that doing his job and speaking his mind wound up being a case of the guy signing the death warrant for his own job.
-srbp-
Just say “No!”
Federal finance leprechaun Jim Flaherty thinks the federal government will take a while to get out of deficit spending and doing that will take a bit of pain.
"I am telling Canadians today that if a politician tries to tell you that getting back to surplus will be pain-free, they are simply not telling you the truth," Flaherty said.
"It will require a lot of saying 'no' to pet projects and special interests."
Flaherty forecast the federal government will be running deficits until 2015. In the meantime, the priority will be on economic stimulus spending and restraining growth in programs.
Guess that means projects requiring tens of billions of federal tax dollars, that currently have no customers - and no sign of customers - for their output, and that are running way behind schedule are going to be SOL.
-srbp-
Oram and Williams give wildly contradictory accounts of Lewisporte decision
As a sharp-eared reader picked up, the raw video of the Premier’s scrum revealed that Lewisporte MHA Wade Verge knew about cuts to health service in his district some time before July 9, 2009.
That’s the day Premier Danny Williams shuffled Ross Wiseman out of health and moved Paul Oram in.
The decision wasn’t announced until August 31, almost two months later. And even then, some people claim, the wording of the news release didn’t make plain what was happening in the affected communities.
The regional health authorities involved didn’t hear about the changes until the morning they were announced.
But even that is now at odds with comments by health minister Paul Oram. Under questioning in the House of Assembly on Wednesday, Oram said the decision was made after a trip he made to the region to discuss the issue with local officials:
The fact is that this decision was made during discussions, Mr. Speaker, with Central Health and Community Services, also with discussions that we had ongoing with the community. The fact of the matter is, we went out to Lewisporte, and we told them very clearly that this facility would not be built or put inside of the new facility. We would not have X-ray and lab inside of the new facility. That is exactly what we told them, Mr. Speaker. They understood where we were coming from and we moved forward on that basis.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.
MS JONES: Mr. Speaker, I ask the minister: Isn’t it true that you told the people in Lewisporte at that time that there would not be a one-roof concept for lab and X-ray services, but you did not tell them you were prepared to gut their service within two weeks, did you?
MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.
SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!
MR. ORAM: Mr. Speaker, I said exactly what I said, and that was that there would be no laboratory and X-ray services under the one roof in the new facility that we were building in Lewisporte. In terms of –
MS JONES: (Inaudible).
MR. ORAM: - if she would let me answer. In terms of a discussion around what was happening with closing out the lab and X-ray part of what we were doing in Lewisporte, that discussion was had but there was no final decision made on that when I was out in Lewisporte.
Either the Premier has his story shagged up or Oram does.
Which is it?
-srbp-
Expropriation by the numbers
At long last the rest of us get to see some of the simple print ads that have been causing such political consternation in central Newfoundland among the supporters of the current administration.
There are a series of them, some of which connect the amount of money to specific things like number of magnetic resonance imaging machines you could buy with the cash.
-srbp-
09 September 2009
Freedom from Information: thousands of bucks for the Premier’s public speeches, redacted
It’s a bit of a hairy-assed editing job but the youtube video posted by VOCM includes a curious reference by the Premier to some of the access to information requests that he finds problematic.
You’ll find it at around the 1:45 mark.
Danny Williams bitches about a request for copies of every speech he’s given as a politician.
That’s right.
The guy who used to think that openness and freedom of information are good things has a problem with someone wanting copies of speeches he gave in public and for which texts exist.
This is the kind of thing that politicians would normally make readily available as a matter of course via the Internet.
Take a second a look around the Internet. Try googling “speaking notes” Politicians actually like people to find their speeches, even when the speeches are appallingly bad.
Why back in the time before the Internet, when your humble e-scribbler used to edit transcripts of speeches by another Premier, the Premier’s Office would photocopy and send out speeches - wait for it - free of charge, on request. If the Internet had existed, we’d have published the damn things on the Internet as soon as we could largely because the Internet is a free means to disseminate information.
in those days, speeches were records of government policy. They were important because people could actually hold government accountable as a result of things said in speeches. And that Premier understood that as uncomfortable as it might be, the public had a right to hold their elected officials to account. Certainly, no one in his office spent time micromanaging the living hell out of the entire government access to information system.
But that was then.
This is now.
And the people looking for stuff like speeches are not people out to get this Premier or any other politician. Ordinary folks like to see what commitments were made. Academics like to see what was said and trace the history of an idea. It’s all legitimate, normal and nothing for someone - especially a politician - to get into a paranoiac lather over.
But just take a breath and think about where Danny Williams’ head is on freedom of information.
Not only does Danny Williams force people to file an access to information request for copies of speeches he has given – they aren’t available otherwise - he then bitches about the fact that people are interested in what he has to say.
Now in the case of that particular request, your humble e-scribbler happens to know about it. An e-mail turned up in ye olde Bond Papers inbox giving the background and the horrendous amount of money Danny Williams’ office was demanding for delivering the speeches in hard copy only, even though they are available electronically.
If memory serves, we are talking thousands of dollars. The speeches had to be produced in hard copy – supposedly – because the Premier’s Office claimed the speeches that were delivered in various public fora would have to be reviewed and possibly redacted.
Redacted?
Bits cut out of a public speech?
And no, they weren’t kidding.
The whole thing has gone off to the information commissioner where it sits, alongside a few other examples of the Premier’s Office efforts to frustrate public disclosure of information that should be in the public domain.
And people wonder why Alice in Wonderland is an apt source of metaphors for politics in Newfoundland and Labrador.
-srbp-
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)