Tory MHA Ed Buckingham reads a prepared talking point on CBC Radio praising Jerome Kennedy and attacking – of all people – the politically deceased John Efford for his comments about recent events in the province.
And Buckingham calls Efford a political hack?
That’s chutzpah.
-srbp-
Popular and influential talk show host Randy Simms is now firmly in the gun sights of the provincial government’s official advisory organization on women’s issues.
The Provincial Advisory Council on the Status of Women is planning an opinion piece for the province’s newspapers and is encouraging people on the PACSW e-mail listserv to join in by writing pieces of their own for local papers and calling both Simms and Bill Rowe on air to voice their opinions.
The controversy centres on remarks Simms made Tuesday to Long Harbour deputy mayor Ed Bruce which didn’t make a headline until Simms was challenged on Wednesday, on air, by newbie St. John’s councillor Sheilagh O’Leary.
An e-mail Thursday from PACSW communications director Elaine Condon described her having the “unfortunate task” of listening to Simms’ show Thursday and hearing what she described as “blatant sexism rear its head over and over.”
The e-mail also included the text of a front-page Telegram story by Alisha Morrissey. That’s not online but an earlier BP post linked to an shorter version of the story that appeared yesterday.
What the Telegram story on either day didn’t make clear is that O’Leary was working on the basis of a half-baked version of Simms’ remarks posted on a local blog.
But as it turns out, the Signal writer also got a half-baked version of events:
I didn't hear it myself and heard it from a third party I trusted. I had never done that before, even for a blog, and I definitely learned my lesson.
Anyway, the transcription is up on Signal now, with a little apology.
And indeed the correct version and an apology has been posted.
The only question that remains is whether or not the half-backed version of Simms’ remarks fed to Signal and O’Leary was an honest misunderstanding in the first place or a deliberate misrepresentation to advance some unknown political agenda.
Simms may well have earned the hatred of some locals for criticising an event featuring only women municipal candidates in the middle of the election. He pointed out that such an event gave an unfair boost some candidates based solely on gender during the campaign and was clearly not in keeping with an effort to encourage more women to come forward as candidates. Simms might now be targeted for payback as a result of his earlier criticism.
The 11 members of the PACSW governing board are appointed by the cabinet under the Status of Women Advisory Council Act. Under the Act, its permanent staff are covered by the Public Service Pensions Act.
The minister responsible for the status of women is natural resources minister Kathy Dunderdale.
-srbp-
Not-yet-sworn-in city councillor Sheilagh O’Leary got off to a very rocky start to her political career on Wednesday as she called Open Line Show host Randy Simms to give him an on-air lecture for comments he supposedly made yesterday.
Right off the bat, O’Leary displayed some questionable judgment since she effectively embarrassed Simms on the air. Had he done something, she could have taken the route of calling him off air. Simms would have then had the chance to offer a mea culpa on his own, thereby saving a huge amount of face.
As it is, O’Leary put Simms in a corner and he responded according. The exchange was heated with Simms at one point referring to O’Leary’s comments as bullshit. O’Leary evidently wasn’t prepared for any push-back and as the thing went on her voice got evidently more tight. In places she came across as condescending and, contrary to her denials, as an advocate for political correctness of the worst possible sort.
It’s not where she’d want to be at all politically, as many of the comments on the Telegram story would attest. Outside of a very small and very narrow group in this town, O’Leary’s attack on Simms will seem to many to be off base and poorly handled. Most of those those who voted for her may wind up wondering what they got for their efforts if this is the way she goes off right at the start.
And they’d be right.
Those of us who heard Simms’ comments initially could not have taken offense at them. Anyone who has listened to Simms would understand his sense of humour.
But you don’t have to take the word of your humble e-scribbler. The Telegram was good enough to give the entire exchange:
“There are two men and five women. Oh, my son you have my sympathy (laughter). You and Gary are not going to get your way on anything, you know that don’t you (laughter). It’s just going to be like being at home, buddy (laughter). We’re being nasty to your lady councillors aren’t we (laughter). No, you’re going to have a good crew out there.”
The problem for O’Leary comes from the fact she got her version not from the horse’s mouth but from a local blog. They didn’t link it but here’s the post from Signal:
“Five women and two men on your town council? My sympathies go out to you, buddy. You’ll never get anything done; it’ll be just like home”
Big difference when you make the edits, isn’t it?
Sheilagh didn’t take the minute to double check the information or to call Randy and give him the chance to back down on his own.
She launched into him live, on the air and without warning.
Bad move.
It’s a political object lesson for the newbie councillor in how to handle issues and political relationships. This is especially the case, as here, where the thing involves someone who is potentially a very influential and supportive ally in provincial politics.
You see, the couple of people who gave O’Leary this story may have been heartened by her call but in the long run this sort of thing can damage the chances of achieving their goals. An experienced politician might have handled it differently.
An experienced politician would have recognised that it is far more effective and far more desirable to have Randy Simms promoting – for example - getting more women involved in the elected side of politics. There may be other issues on gender or access where Simms’ support would carry a lot of way.
It isn’t a question of compromising principles but rather of sacrificing a first blush and admittedly amateurish impulse in order to achieve a larger goal.
O’Leary - understandably – made the noob mistake.
The sensible thing for her to do would be to call Randy publicly and sort the thing out quickly.
And the next time think before picking up the phone to a call in show.
Oh yes, and here’s a big one.
Find someone she trusts who has more experience in politics who she can rely on for advice. She’s at the start of what could be a long and promising political career. If she settles in, that will be the case.
O’Leary’s voters were looking for a Shannie. If she does more of what her voters heard on Wednesday, they might wonder if they instead got a politician more along the lines of …shall we say… the opposite of Shannie. And Heaven knows St. John’s had enough of that kind of politics before it got a better paying job.
-srbp-
On September 10, 2009, then health minister Paul Oram gave a version of the health care cuts decision that contradicted what his boss was saying.
On September 21, 2009, then health minister Paul Oram said that his own administration had boosted spending to levels that were unsustainable.
That was an amazing admission that the province’s finances were in such a horrendous state. Until then virtually every cabinet minister had claimed the opposite.
Paul’s talk of cuts prompted your humble e-scribbler to remind the universe of a previously unsuccessful health minister whose daughter now works for the Premier and of the current Premier’s own phrase when talking about a previous administration. But that was just fun.
On September 29, 2009, then justice minister Tom Marshall turned up on a local call-in show to discuss the province’s finances.
Marshall said a whole bunch of things that tended to affirm Oram’s statement, although Marshall – who had been finance minister for the highest of the high-spending years never actually said the word “unsustainable.”
But notice that it was Marshall delivering the message.
Not Jerome Kennedy, the guy actually holding down the title of finance minister at the time.
But Tom Marshall, the former finance minister, calling from his ministerial office in Corner Brook.
This was the day Danny headed off for a gigantic swan hobnobbing with the international environmental hoi-polloi that ran from the 30th of September to October 2.
On October 1st – and despite his previous insistence that the cuts at Flower’s Cove and Lewisporte were carved in stone - Paul restored at least some of the previous cut in Flower’s Cove.
Danny got back on the weekend.
On Monday, Paul told Danny he was leaving. That’s by Paul’s own version of the timing.
Paul heads off to Buchans for an emergency town meeting, called very hastily by the provincial government Tuesday morning.
The next morning, Oram ends it all, politically, in front of the House of Assembly.
Of course, Oram has some cock and bull set of talking points about health issues and the pain his family suffered and the evils of the CBC none of which explained why he was not only bailing out of cabinet but hauling ass out of politics altogether.
Oram was slitting the wrists of his own political body and yet he was blaming someone else for wielding the blade.
One of the examples Oram cited as painful was having his wife’s name on the television news in connection with the family business.
Odd that Paul Oram backbencher had no trouble with his wife’s picture and name being in a Labrador newspaper when she and her husband travelled to Labrador west talking about opening a new personal care home in the area. Anyone got a picture of that to share for posterity?
But that’s to get away from the real oddity here namely the appearance of the former finance minister a week or so before he got the job back again to tackle a finance issue when there was a perfectly serviceable finance minister more than capable of sorting out the whole issue. And to really add to the oddity, the formerly serviceable finance minister has now become the health minister.
The timing and the comments all seem a little curious.
One of the Premier’s most loyal foot soldiers leaving politics so quickly is highly unusual in itself.
The context might make it more unusual.
And if that’s the case, then Paul’s reference to Danny Williams as having been a father figure to him?
Well, that’s just likely to give a body the heebie jeebies.
-srbp-
Jerome Kennedy is the new health minister.
There was talk a year or so ago that Kennedy was anxious to move into the high pressure job as a way of proving himself on the way to the Eighth Floor.
He didn’t get his wish at the time, what with the Premier stuffing him in finance instead.
Well, a short while later Jerome got his dream job.
And he won’t have quite the same commute as his predecessors did when cabinet meetings were on.
Interestingly enough, the Premier didn’t take the opportunity to replace Trevor Taylor who quit last week.
Instead, the acting minister of transportation will carry on. Tom Marshall will go back to finance and Felix Collins will get the minister’s job in justice.
There won’t be a permanent replacement for Trevor until some unspecified time later, apparently.
Curious.
-srbp-
Paul Oram left politics entirely today blaming ill health and the news media who apparently hounded him and his family.
That second one never lasted a second as reporters quite rightly pointed out that oram himself and his boss have said far worse about their political enemies than any reporter ever said about either one.
Watch the scrum down the right hand side of the cbc.ca/nl website.
The reporters cut him no slack, in other words and nailed his bullshit about the media for what it was. He mentioned the coverage of his conflict of interest, in particular during the scrum.
There are still many questions left by Oram’s sudden departure.
Why did he leave so hastily, leaving the Premier so little time to lash together a replacement scheme that he couldn’t even replace Trevor Taylor properly?
Why did Oram opt to quit entirely when he could have asked for a temporary leave from cabinet until he got his blood pressure under control?
Why did Oram leave politics altogether? The back bench is not a hard spot and Oram could have taken the pause to get his health in order.
As with Trevor’s departure there is much more to this than meets the eye.
-srbp-
Embattled health minister Paul Oram is holding a newser in 15 minutes to discuss his political fate.
That’s usually code for announcing his resignation.
If he resigns quickly that would cause another by-election before Christmas but it would certainly be the second high profile cabinet minister to resign unexpectedly within the space of two weeks.
-srbp-
Ever the eagle eye, labradore has noted that Tom Hedderson is the latest provincial cabinet minister to have problems with time.
Tom Rideout thought tomorrow was a day months in the future.
Tom Marshall thinks that half a day of cursory mentions of a bill in the legislature in 2007 is widely debating something.
Now Tom Hedderson’s make-work project for fishermen announced just within the past few days has an application deadline last July:
And Tom issued a news release just yesterday claiming this was the best make work project in the province’s history.
Sure.
It could be.
If people can travel backwards in time to get the application in.
You just cannot make this stuff up.
-srbp-
A mere six years ago this month, the Provincial Conservatives were on the campaign trail promising to bring a new approach to the province’s affairs.
In light of recent events, it’s useful to recall what they promised way back then if only to see just exactly how much they haven’t accomplished. For the record, here are the Tory fishery commitments, found stuffed in a bunch of old Kraft Cheez-Whiz jars in a cave somewhere along the coast. Contrary to rumour it wasn’t in Tors Cove.
This is the batch of Tory promises on the fishery from 2003, word for word as they appeared in the Blue Book. The notes in Italics are comments by your humble e-scribbler. In some cases, it’s pretty clear what happened but in others there may well be things that slipped by unnoticed.
If someone can update or correct the information, by all means do so. Credit should go where it is due, if it is due.
A healthy fishing industry must play a leading role in Newfoundland and Labrador's long-term economic well-being. It is the Province's largest private-sector employer. Entire regional economies are based on the sustainable harvesting and processing of fisheries resources, and transportation, fuel, technology and service industries rely on the business the fishing industry generates.
Sound and Scientific Fisheries Management
The industry must be restructured and managed to avoid the disasters of the past and adapt to the opportunities of the future. In particular, a shared fisheries management structure should be developed that will merge federal-provincial policy and management responsibilities into a complementary process for better conservation and management of the resource. It also requires fisheries policies based on the best available scientific evidence, enforcement of Canadian conservation measures, and monitoring by Canada of all fishing activity on the continental shelf.
A Progressive Conservative government will pursue a Canada - Newfoundland and Labrador Fisheries Agreement for a decision-making process in which the federal and provincial governments work in partnership for the sustainable management of the fisheries.
[BP Note: Did they even try for that one? Bitching doesn’t count since they also promised a better relationship with the feds based on rationality not and name-calling.]
The fishery is undergoing dramatic changes. Cod and other ground fish have collapsed. Stocks of snow crab and shrimp have expanded dramatically. Changes of such magnitude require precise, up-to-date scientific information on the marine ecosystem, the sustainable harvesting of fish stocks, and efforts to restore naturally reproducing populations.
Scientists and economists also play a leading role in establishing new directions for fisheries management through research into underutilized species and new value-added marine products, innovative harvesting and processing technology, successful marketing strategies, aquaculture, and the use of marine genetic resources for pharmaceutical and commercial applications.
A Progressive Conservative government will establish a Fisheries Science and Management Research Institute at Memorial University that will provide scientific, technical, and economic support for the sustainable development of Newfoundland and Labrador marine fisheries and aquaculture. The multi-disciplinary Institute will:
- Undertake research and establish links with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, other federal and provincial agencies, fish harvesters, and experts around the world to provide decision-makers with the research-based information they need to develop sound fishery management policy.
- Supply the industry with product, technology, market and economic research and information needed to diversify and improve value-added production.
- Find out how resource management decisions affect people and communities.
[BP Note: This was such a great idea they made essentially the same commitment again in 2007, albeit in a much more modest form:
Foreign Fishing on the Nose and Tail of the Grand Banks
For the people of Newfoundland and Labrador, the fish stocks on our continental shelf could be fished indefinitely with proper management, while foreigners see them as stocks to be harvested intensively until they are no longer economically profitable, or are fished to extinction. These conflicting values underscore the need for Canada to extend its management over the entire continental shelf and to regulate both the domestic and international fishery for sustainable development.
- A Progressive Conservative government will carry out nation-wide public information campaigns aimed at persuading Ottawa to take custodial management over the Nose and Tail of the Grand Banks, and to undertake whatever regulatory and enforcement activities are necessary to manage sustainable fisheries on the entire continental shelf.
[BP Note: nation-wide information campaigns? Anyone recall seeing anything that looked like that?]
A Sustainable Seafood Processing Sector
Seafood processors have to deal with resource scarcity, different species, and markets that are more oriented to value-added products than ever before. Consumers clearly prefer a variety of products that require a minimum of time and effort to prepare and retain as much of their original appearance and taste as possible.
For today's consumers, value-added not only means further processing of raw materials but also consistent quality standards in handling, packing and transporting seafood products. Added to these trends are new applications for marine products in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals and healthcare products, and many other new and useful biochemical commodities.
Workers in our processing plants are plagued with low incomes and inconsistent employment. Part of the solution to this chronic problem is in doing more with what we have and finding new uses for that which we have not utilized in the past. A Progressive Conservative government will implement a comprehensive strategy to improve the viability of our industry and increase employment levels in the Province by:
- Requiring value-added processing where it is economically feasible and putting greater emphasis on retail packs where possible. [BP Note: This look familiar to anyone?]
- Promoting utilization of a variety of marine species in food processing, as well as new industrial uses of marine products in pharmaceuticals, biomedicines, and other chemical products.
- Forming partnerships with industry to implement an international procurement program to secure primary seafood products for local seafood processing plants. [BP Note: How about this one? Finding raw materials overseas to push through local plants. Did they even try that?]
- Encouraging local investment in fishing enterprises and related industries, and requiring fishing enterprises to register and maintain their head offices in the Province. [BP Note: Does breaking up FPI count as the complete opposite of this?]
- Restructuring the harvesting and processing sectors of the industry around the principles of resources sustainability, adjacency, quality assurance and economic viability. [BP Note: Just going out on a limb that this never got out the door.]
Quality Assurance and Marketing
Quality control is important for the fish processing industry, which is heavily export-oriented. Maintaining high standards of food quality and food safety is necessary to retaining access to international markets, and adds millions of dollars to the value of our annual seafood production.
A Progressive Conservative government will upgrade the Quality Assurance Program to include a mandatory quality control system for handling fish and seafood products intended for export that meets the highest international standards for food quality and safety.
As international markets become increasingly competitive, we must ensure that Newfoundland and Labrador seafood is at the forefront of the global marketplace.
A Progressive Conservative government will work with industry to develop and implement a comprehensive, long-term marketing strategy aimed at promoting the Province's seafood industry with a goal of increasing sales in world markets. Promoting the quality of our seafood product is key to successful marketing, and must play a pivotal role in the strategic plan. The strategy would also include the following:
- Providing processors with the marketing expertise required to successfully promote and market products.
- Developing effective techniques for promoting the quality of seafood products in national and international markets through trade missions, product promotions and trade shows.
- Facilitating the sharing of ideas and experiences in the interest of enhancing the marketing of Newfoundland and Labrador seafood products. [BP Note: Again, just thinking here that the destruction of FPI and the sale of the marketing arm to a Nova Scotia company, along with all the well-established and recognised international brands would be pretty much the opposite of this policy plank.]
The Province will also acquire the necessary expertise to participate in Canadian trade negotiations through NAFTA, the European Common Market, and Asian countries to ensure that Newfoundland and Labrador seafood products have fair access to markets in the United States, Europe and Asia. [BP Note: Seeing this commitment in 2003 just makes the whole thing about European trade all the more whack-o.]
Many of the Province's wild fisheries are either fully- or over-exploited, and those remaining have to be harvested on an ecologically sustainable basis, which means the volume of wild fish landed around the world will be well below the market demand for seafood products.
Aquaculture offers the main prospect of filling this gap, and will be a significant contributor to the economy of coastal regions in the future. Farmed products are rapidly replacing declining wild species on the international seafood market. Since 1990, values have doubled to over $75 billion.
Although this Province is an important player in the wild fisheries, it accounts for only a tiny fraction of world aquaculture production. Considerable development will be required over the coming years to establish Newfoundland and Labrador farmed fish and shellfish as a viable addition to wild fishery supplies in domestic and international markets.
Aquaculture can be a financially viable industry in this Province and operate within environmentally sound parameters. We have the site capacity to become the largest producer of aquaculture products in Canada, which would bring related economic activity and thousands of jobs to dozens of communities along our coasts.
A Progressive Conservative government will facilitate the expansion of profitable and sustainable aquaculture enterprises in the Province through:
- Support for scientific research to identify potential new locations, develop technologies, investigate potential environmental problems, and cultivate robust stocks of existing and new species, so that the industry can produce better quality products and receive better prices.
- Incentives to promote long-term venture capital investments in aquaculture enterprises.
- Development of high levels of skill and knowledge in the technical, business and marketing aspects of the industry.
- Working with the industry to raise standards and improve efficiency so as to secure a profitable and sustainable future for aquaculture enterprises.
[BP Note: Here’s the one place where the current administration has done fairly well. They’ve dropped large chunks of cash into aquaculture and managed to lure a major player into the local scene. Then again, this was the easiest thing to accomplish. It only required throwing money into it and that’s pretty much the one thing they had plenty of.
-srbp-
Political media commentary in Canada is usually funny.
Lately, commentary on federal politics is even funnier.
Example The First: Winston Smith makes several cogent observations which should - among other things - put to death that always laughable Connie excuse that the news media are biased in favour of the Liberals. Read Winston. He’s always sharp as a tack. he’s not the funny stuff; the people he’s writing about are funny, albeit not meaning to be laughable.
Example The Second: the bevy of comment in many quarters prompted by the Prime Minister’s recent tickling of the ivories at the National Arts Centre. Again, unintentionally risible.
You got your American bloggers of the conservative variety.
You got your locals of the something variety, including the line “I am growing more and more impressed with Stephen Harper.” Now just note that for what it’s worth. If that comment is coming from that source, be sure that there will be no ABC campaign in the next federal election.
But anyway…
There are news stories and columns all over the place.
Only one journalist so far has nailed the point about the whole NAC thing and she did so this morning with a pithy line to the effect that the piano is the latest version of the sweater vest.
In other words, it’s a contrivance. Sure the guy plays the piano but the entire episode was designed to create exactly the commentary it is generating.
As great as that is, it is a sure sign of just how vacuous is the political landscape that the biggest national story is that the PM can bash out a Beatles tune on the nearest Yamaha.
It’s as irrelevant to the universe as the claim the Liberals are on a campaign to bring the government down or any protest that Jack Layton and his Dippers propped up Stephen Harper just recently because they could score some dough for their peeps.
All three federal political parties are suffering from a gross leadership problem the proof of which is the fact that the big news out of Ottawa is about Denis Coderre, a non-election scare and a guy who took music lessons.
In the meantime, just think about the stuff that none of them are actually talking about.
Anyone been following economic news lately, for example?
-srbp-
In 2003: a bevy of promises designed to restructure and rebuild the fishing industry. Heady days were those: “The industry must be restructured and managed to avoid the disasters of the past and adapt to the opportunities of the future.”
In 2009, the provincial fisheries minister can only defend his government’s policy by saying they have come up with the best make-work scheme ever:
This is the first time that the province has provided a CEEP program for harvesters and it is the best program the province has ever provided for plant workers. [Emphasis added]
Could there be any more astonishing an admission of the abject failure of the provincial government to deal with the fishery?
Well, that would be the laundry list of subsidies, money and other spending on the fishery in lieu of that restructuring and management promised in 2003.
Hand-outs are – by their nature – evidence of a government that has run out of ideas and/or political ability.
-srbp-
it took a bit but labradore has laid waste to the latest bit of silliness coming from some quarters about the Glorious Growth of In-Migration.
There’s even a nice little graph that shows that since 1961 upticks in in-migration coincide with recessions. Not surprisingly, the most recent uptick is the biggest and coincides with what the late lamented Tory Trevor Taylor described as the biggest economic downturn since the Great Depression.
The diaspora returneth not to the homeland after all, it seems.
-srbp-
A quarter of a century ago, Doug House and the Royal Commission on Employment and Unemployment heard time and again of the the need to get rid of make-work programs.
Qualifying people for federal employment insurance benefits promoted a culture of dependence and destroyed innovation and self-reliance.
Some 17 years ago, the province’s Strategic Economic Plan introduced a bold, new approach in order to bring about fundamental changes within Newfoundland and Labrador. There’d be no more make work and government free gifts to businesses. Neither one worked to produce sustainable jobs.
Less than a decade after the Royal Commission – with the change of administration in 1996, in fact - things were heading back to the old ways of megaprojects and make-work schemes.
In 2003, there was a new crowd, who supposedly had a plan called the New Approach. Some of it seemed familiar. Doug House came back and then left again.
Nothing changed.
It’s still megaprojects, make-work and more make-work and handouts to business, hand-outs to business, hand-outs to business, hand-outs to business and hand-outs to business.
Oh, and let’s not forget hand-outs to business.
-srbp-
We can all know for sure because not only did the leader of the provincial Tory party announce it, the former president of the party “confirmed” it.
Did Paul Reynolds think we didn't trust Danny or something?
This should be an interesting race.
-srbp-
A 10 minute video from the provincial government’s energy monopoly corporation is titled “Innovation in Renewable Energy”.
So what’s so innovative about damming off a river to generate electricity and running transmission lines to market?
Why nothing at all, of course, and in the case of the Lower Churchill project, the ideas from transmission line running around Quebec to the entire project itself have all been around for about 45 years.
There’s even the highly unimaginative and incorrect claim that running a power line down to Soldier’s Pond will “displace” the diesel generators at Holyrood.
And the project is a heckuva long way from starting if the current trends continue.
The only real innovation mentioned is in the discussion of the Ramea wind-hydrogen-diesel test project.
But that’s one project, it’s a small project and it’s more than five years away from anything significant. Meanwhile, the rest of the world is much farther along in developing alternative energy technologies.
Maybe what the provincial government should be doing is figuring out a way to turn bullshit into energy. If that was the case, videos like this show they’ve already got a powerhouse that could displace the entire global output of greenhouse gases until the end of time.
At least when it comes to the Lower Churchill, the current administration has shown it is highly adept at recycling even if it’s complete lack of planning beyond what was done 20 years ago is painfully obvious.
-srbp-
There’s something about the life of provincial political parties that gets to be a bit predictable.
Like you can tell how healthy the party in government is by how successfully it attracts high quality, high profile candidates into its ranks after the first general election when it takes power.
You see one of the jobs the leader of a party gets to do is find candidates. They get to pick the people or approve of the people who run for the party. Leaders of parties in power usually have an easier time, but the leader still has some work to do in spotting talent and bringing it forward.
Now some people like to think otherwise.
You’ll see comments in the local media lately that Hisself would not work with some of the current governing crop if this were his own private business. But the thing is that Hisself actually did pick ‘em all. And even if there were a couple he didn’t recruit to run or approve to run and work to get elected, he certainly picks the people who serve in his cabinet.
And it’s not just the health of parties in power that shows up in candidate selection. Take a party like the provincial New Democrats during the leadership of the fellow now in Ottawa helping Jack Layton keep Harper and the Connies in power. Every by-election and general election seemed to come like a total surprise to them. The party never seemed to grow and never seemed able to capitalise on a couple of noteworthy successes in the 1980s.
Ditto the Liberals in the aftermath of 2003 or for that matter in Trinity North before the fellow changed teams.
Take a look at the pending by-election in the Straits and White Bay North. Just ignore the fact that the seat is vacated with unseemly haste by a fellow Danny Williams has come to rely on as a bit of an attack crackie alongside John Hickey.
Just notice that even though the seat used to be held by a Tory big-wing and even though said big-wig was looking to bail about six months ago and even though he made a firm decision a month ago, the best the Tories could come up with to replace Trevor was the guy who was Trevor’s constituency assistant.
You won’t see much mention of that in media stories on Rick Pelley but that’s who he was until today.
Now some executive assistants can wind up being superlative politicians in their own right. But there’s something about a guy bailing out and his EA being the one to get the nomination that makes you scratch your head. Maybe what’s really so noticeable here is that Pelley is running a mere six years after these guys got to power.
Maybe it’s because the first Tory EA to run and get elected was in 2007, a mere four years after the party took power. back in the 1990s, the Liberals got through two terms before the first executive assistants started turning up as candidates. Before that there were fresh faces.
Now maybe there’s nothing to this at all beyond the original questions raised by the way Golden Boy Trevor Taylor bailed in the first place.
But still, maybe you only have to look at the stark contrast between what Taylor said back in 2001 and how things turned out to find out why the Tories got the candidate they got in this case:
I want to ensure The Straits & White Bay North is poised to ride the wave that's about to wash over this province. This is no time for backroom silence and backbencher obedience. Now is the time for the district to take a bold step in a new direction. It's a time for someone who will speak up loudly and effectively for this district, and people know that's exactly what they'll get in electing me.
Electing Trevor’s EA hardly would seem like a bold step in a new direction.
And as for that bit about backbencher obedience, well, these days everyone pretty well knows how much of a joke Trevor’s words turned out be.
-srbp-
As much as some people like to moan about The Racket, there were a couple of things this past week to show that that self-serving load-of-crap bit of whinging for what it is.
First, Arnold told an audience at the Governors’ climate conference in California that it was worth putting up with all the shit he takes as governor because he wants to give something back to the state that has given him everything.
Yes, there are people looking for more government money and people complaining about him and people poking into his life, but darn it, everything he has – from his success as an actor to his family – are attributable to California.
Yes people, real leaders don’t bitch about a job they volunteered for six years ago.
Second, not a single person during the entire period since 2001 has dared ask Hisself a question even vaguely as outrageous as the one faced by Gordo Brown earlier the week:
Heck they have a hard time putting a real question to Ole Twitchy sometimes let alone getting an answer.
Even people asking simple stuff like how many people went with him on the swan to California and how much it cost taxpayers get told to file an Access to Information request.
At least the crowd that surround Hisself have a sense of humour.
