From the Mirror, a list of comments.
You have to pick whether the line came from Charlie Sheen or Muammar Qadafhi.
Then try the Vanity Fair version.
- srbp -
The real political division in society is between authoritarians and libertarians.
From the Mirror, a list of comments.
You have to pick whether the line came from Charlie Sheen or Muammar Qadafhi.
Then try the Vanity Fair version.
- srbp -
The Atlantic Accord Implementation Act, 1987 allows for the appointment of two vice-chairs at the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board.
But with two vice-chairs, who will be the board member to fill in for chief executive officer Max Ruelokke if he is away for a vacation or is otherwise not on the job?
Here’s what section 14 says:
The Board shall designate a member to act as Chairman of the Board during any absence or incapacity of the Chairman or vacancy in the office of Chairman, and that person, while acting as Chairman, has and may exercise all of the powers and perform all of the duties and functions of the Chairman.
- srbp -
Take out a piece of paper and a pencil and it wouldn’t take you very long to write down the names of men and women from the private or public sector who are qualified by their experience to take on the job of vice-chair at the federal-provincial agency that regulates the offshore industry.
Limit the list to just women and you’d still have a fair number of very capable people.
Elizabeth Matthews - Danny Williams’ former communications director - wouldn’t be on the list anywhere.
She wouldn’t be left out of consideration because she isn’t smart or capable in her own right. It’s just that she lacks the experience necessary for the job.
It’s that simple.
By proposing to appoint the unqualified Matthews as vice chair of the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board, Kathy Dunderdale has shown exactly the same tendency to propose unqualified people for very important jobs her patron had. Andy Wells, the former mayor of St. John’s is perhaps the best example of that.
However, Andy Wells is surely not the only example of an appointment that left many people scratching their heads in bewilderment or – as again with the Matthews appointment – setting teeth on edge in the province’s oil industry. They might have understood appointing Danny Williams’ former chief of staff who is also looking for a new gig now that Williams has left politics. At least, Brian Crawley had work experience in the industry on the Hibernia project. For the past couple of weeks though, the movers and shakers in the local oil patch are shaking their heads at the sort of appointment one might find in some banana republic rather than in a Canadian jurisdiction that aspires to be among the world leaders in regulating a complex industry.
Conservatives are trotting out the idea that Matthews will somehow change the communications practices at the board because of her work experience. The board already has a competent and experience public relations practitioner, for one thing and Matthews certainly isn’t needed for that. What’s more important to realise in that regard is that, as others have pointed out, Matthews helped to create and sustain one of the most secretive political machines in the province’s history.
What both the provincial [and] federal governments ought to have done in this case is what the position warrants: an open competition in which the successful candidate is appointed based on merit. That’s how such a senior position ought to be filled. That’s how they filled the chairman’s job a few years. The process wound up a mess [in that case] simply because Danny Williams intervened to try and foist his blatantly unqualified whim onto a process that was supposed to be driven by merit. Just because the law says appointments like this are made by cabinet does not mean that they must be handed out as patronage plums.
Merit ought to count for much more that it does with the current provincial administration.
- srbp -
* Corrections in square brackets
Not surprisingly at all, the federal Conservatives now call it the “Harper government”.
From 2003 to 2010 in Newfoundland and Labrador, it was always the Williams government, too.
- srbp -
The Western Star - the newspaper that previously blamed the opposition Liberals for Danny Williams’ expropriation fiasco – now thinks that Liberals should just go away and let the Conservatives do as they see fit.
Is that just an extraordinarily stupid comment, even for the Western Star, or what?
- srbp -
A new poll by VisionCritical/Angus Reid shows Kathy Dunderdale with the second highest approval rating of premiers across Canada. Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall topped the list at 63% approval, with 16% undecided
But look at the numbers in the wider context and you can see why the provincial government’s pollster was in the news this week lowering public expectations for his client. Don Mills told the Telegram that: “[Premier Kathy Dunderdale’s popularity is] not going to be 75 per cent, I wouldn’t think.”
Mills’ polling firm was cluing up the quarterly survey when he made the comments. The VisionCritical/Angus Reid numbers give an indication of the numbers Mills was likely picking up.
Dunderdale’s got the highest reported undecided – 35% – of any Premier in the country. Dunderdale is slightly ahead of New Brunswick Conservative at 33% undecided. His approval rating is also the third highest at 42%.
Dunderdale is also a long way from Danny Williams’ approval numbers. In November 2010 he was at 67% and in February 2010 he had the approval of 80% of those surveyed. Fully 78% approved of Williams and only 12% were unsure in November 2009.
That was an enormous drop for Williams and the trend is still downward for his hand-picked successor.
What’s more, VisionCritical/Angus Reid’s question is not a choice of one leader compared to others: it merely measures people’s opinion about the premier himself or herself from people within their respective provinces. Mills’ polls ask respondents to chose the political party leader they would prefer to see as Premier.
- srbp -
Natural resources minister Shawn Skinner has hit on a cheaper, less risky green alternative to the Muskrat Falls megaproject.
He didn’t mean to do that, of course. he was actually trying to justify Muskrat Falls by claiming the project will give the province energy security by allowing the island portion of the province to import power from the mainland in the event of an emergency.
The major way of doing that would be through the tie to Nova Scotia, according to Skinner. As the Telegram quotes Skinner:
“We’re anticipating to mostly use it to export excess capacity, excess electricity into the Atlantic provinces and the northeast United States, but in the event of a catastrophe … it would be possible for us to import electricity,” Skinner said in a recent interview.
That’s certainly true, but that isn’t a rationale for building a very expensive dam in Labrador and a very expensive power line from that dam to St. John’s especially when the island portion of the province doesn’t need the juice.
But let’s just allow for a second that the island needs power. Skinner has actually given Newfoundlanders and Labradorians a far better option to meet the province’s energy needs that building Muskrat Falls.
At $1.2 billion, the line to Nova Scotia would actually meet the island’s energy needs and give the energy security Skinner is talking about. Nalcor or Newfoundland Power could import power from the mainland if it is needed.
But more importantly the line from Nova Scotia and an upgrade to the line across the Isthmus of Avalon would help bring to market all that stranded central Newfoundland hydro seized by government in the botched expropriation. In addition, it would allow for wind and new small hydro projects on the island. Right now, there’s no place for that extra power to go when it isn’t needed on the island. A link to Nova Scotia would take care of that.
And all that wind generation and small hydro – far cheaper than Muskrat Falls - would help displace the thermal generator at Holyrood with green energy that is far cheaper than the $5.0 billion dam and power line project that is at the heart of Danny Williams’ legacy project.
The line would cost $1.2 billion compared to $5.0 billion for the dam and line to St.John’s. Emera is already committed to the Nova Scotia line. If Nalcor split the bill 50/50, then the actual cost of Nalcor would be a mere $600 million plus annual operating costs. Nalcor and Emera wouldn’t need a federal loan guarantee or any federal financial help at all in that scenario. Nalcor could fund its share from offshore oil revenues. Heck, the provincial government could build it’s share of the line right now for cash since it has billions on hand in temporary investments. Talk about the perfect go-it-alone, stand-on-your-own-two-feet, “have province” option.
On top of that, there are plenty of private operators ready to build wind projects on the island; the only thing stopping them right now is Nalcor and government policy. In other words, there’s no practical reason not to pursue the cheaper, green options. Private sector companies could build the projects either alone or in partnership with Nalcor.
Unfortunately, the tie to Nova Scotia is the last thing on the list of things to be built for the current version of the Lower Churchill. And right now Skinner and his colleagues are obsessed with a very expensive very risky project that could wind up going way over budget.
Given the soft markets for electricity in the near-term, it would actually make economic sense to wait a while to build the entire Lower Churchill until the markets will buy the power with long-term deals. That’s much better for consumers in the province who, right now, are staring at a government hell-bent on doubling their electricity rates by 2017 and saddling them with $5.0 billion in debt on top of the $12 billion they currently owe.
There’d be an added bonus in building the Nova Scotia line first: Nalcor would have export infrastructure plus it would have a megaproject to its credit to prove to investors it can deliver complex engineering work on-time and at or under budget.
On top of that, a policy that encouraged private sector investment for wind development would go a long way to reversing the image the province has gained since 2003 of a banana republic where the government is closed for business.
Cheap, green energy to meet the needs on the most populous part of the province at a low cost and with the potential to bring new revenue from exports?
Job done.
Below you’ll find the complete text of a statement issued Tuesday by the Association of Seafood Producers.
Key bits:
:
You an find the Telegram’s online story here.
- srbp -
The NunatuKavut Metis Nation will be seeking an injunction to halt environmental assessment hearings on the Muskrat Falls project, according to CBC News.
Chris Montague of the NunatuKavut Metis Nation said the group is meeting with a lawyer Tuesday morning.
He said the Metis group expects to file an injunction against Nalcor, the provincial environmental department, and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, as soon as Tuesday or Wednesday.
UPDATE: The Metis filed an injunction on Tuesday morning in the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, according to the Telegram.
- srbp -
Debbie Hanlon doesn’t think so.
Residents of the city took pains to explain otherwise in the comments section of Monday’s Telegram story. Their comments make this story well worth reading.
- srbp -
- srbp -
The United States Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Regulation and Enforcement has issued a license to Noble Energy to continue work on a well located 115 kilometres southeast of Venice, Louisiana, according to the Globe and Mail and other media outlets.
The company started drilling the exploratory well just before last year’s catastrophe.
The Wall Street Journal reports the well is in 6,500 feet of water.
There are six other permits for deep water drilling currently awaiting approval, according to the New York Times.
- srbp -
cornerbrooker.com has a great little piece on the west coast city’s municipal by-election.
This leaves five candidates competing for one City Council seat: June Alteen, Gary Kelly, Trent Quinton, Tarragh Shanahan, and Alton Whelan.
Aside from some lawn signs, most candidates have been fairly quiet so far, however I think that Gary Kelly is at least proving that he’s visible and willing to work for the position. You may have seen him marching up and down O’Connell Drive in all sorts of nasty weather, or standing outside hockey games at the Pepsi Centre with his bright yellow campaign sign, waving as the cars head down the hill.
They mention that Gary also has a website and is using Twitter and Facebook. That’s not surprising for a guy who was an early adopter to blogging and who ran one of the best little gems of a blog in the process. A lot of politicians in the province could learn a lot of lessons from Gary.
For what it’s worth, Gary has the Bond Papers endorsement. Corner Brook readers of these e-scribblers would be well served if they voted for Gary in the by-election.
- srbp -
Provincial government pollster Don Mills is in the Telegram on Monday getting people ready for yet a further decline in polling numbers for the province’s ruling Conservatives.
“[Premier Kathy Dunderdale’s popularity is] not going to be 75 per cent, I wouldn’t think,” he said. “To some extent, it will have nothing to do with Kathy Dunderdale at all. I think it’s just going to be people realizing that (Williams) was a pretty extraordinary personality that commanded support across party lines.”
As you can see, Mills wasn’t just contented to hint that the numbers would be down; he also felt obliged to offer his opinion on the implications. The basis for his opinion won’t ever be found in any of his polling numbers. They are – like his seat projections in 2007 – based on something else.
Mills is talking about personality popularity – or even name recognition – but neither of those are directly connected to ballot results. Danny Williams personal popularity soared after 2005 but in the 2007 general election, the Conservatives garnered the same share of eligible vote they had in 2003.
A recent poll by NTV/Telelink puts the Conservatives under Kathy Dunderdale as the choice of 44% of eligible vote. That continues a steady decline registered by Corporate Research over the third and fourth quarters of 2010. If the implication of Mills’ comments are borne out, CRA’s poll that is just clueing up should confirm the NTV/Telelink numbers.
- srbp -
A classic Telegram editorial, your humble e-scribbler once wrote, consists of a summary of an issue concluding with a blinding insight into the completely frigging obvious.
Such is the Saturday Telegram offering, this time on the latest fisheries report unveiled and summarily rejected on Friday by fisheries minister Clyde Jackman:
Something has to be done. It may end up being a half-measure, or even less. But the sheer size of the problem is now abundantly clear. And for the industry, it has to be terrifying.
Four phrases.
Four penetrating insights into what is obvious to even the most casual observer of the fishery over the past 30 years.
That closing paragraph is right up there with Clyde Jackman’s claim on Friday that the MOU process was not a waste as everyone now had a detailed description of how bad things are.
Who didn’t know that already?
Well, besides Clyde Jackman, evidently.
To be fair to both Jackman and the Telegram editorialist, though, they really are just a reflection of the fundamental problem that has plagued the fishery in this province since 1949. People know what needs to be done to turn the fishery into an industry that is sustainable and relatively prosperous. People in the current cabinet know. People in past cabinets have known. Those who know and who are willing to do it are hampered by those who know nothing and others who vigorously oppose any changes at all.
In the meantime, the only people suffering are the people in the industry. Eventually time will take care of them. Clyde Jackman kept mentioning that last Friday. He really didn’t need to.
Everyone knows it.
- srbp -
My, oh my what a little public angst over electricity bills will do for a government’s talking points.
The public angst has turned up in Labrador where a who mess of people are concerned they won’t get any of the benefits of the power and yet will wind up paying for it instead.
Premier Kathy Dunderdale zoomed into Happy Valley-Goose Bay late last week to reassure the unhappy valleyians on a few things.
Among the things she talked about was electricity pricing. According to the Labradorian, Dunderdale said that Labradorians would not see rate increases once Muskrat is on line.
Fair enough. They will still be getting powered by diesel along the coast since it is apparently too expensive to sling off lines to the coastal communities from the giant lines that will run right along the coast to get the power to Newfoundland.
“The responsibility of power will be charged to the people who use that power,” she said.
Garbled sentence to one side, that “responsibility of power” would not fall to Nova Scotians. They’ll pay whatever Emera wants to charge them and Emera is getting its power from Muskrat for free if the final deal turns out to be the same as the one Danny Williams inked in order to catch his plane to retirement.
That “responsibility of power” would definitely be the people on the eastern end of Newfoundland. They are getting the power and will have to bear the full load of the cost and potentially more more besides even though they really don’t need it.
And how much will they be responsible for?
That’s where Dunderdale went wobbly.
Last fall, natural resources minister Kathy Dunderdale, later morphed to be premier, was absolutely adamant that the Danny Williams Legacy Dam project was absolutely wonderful. It was splendiferously necessary, sayeth Dunderdale, because by 2017, electricity prices in the provinces were going to skyrocket thanks to the price of oil.
She even had a number she swore by: 120 American bucks a barrel, sustained, by 2017 and as much a 200 bucks a barrel within the next decade. And with crude running at those sorts of prices, it would be damn expensive to generate electricity at Holyrood. Enter Danny Williams Legacy Dam to save the day.
Some of you may recall her interview last November with CBC radio’s West Coast Morning Show. Your humble e-scribbler even wrote about it for those who don’t normally tune in to the show:
Dunderdale claimed that electricity prices would increase an average of five percent each year from now until 2017. That’s the year Nalcor would supposedly bring Muskrat Falls on line. So electricity prices would be about 35% higher than they are now, according to Dunderdale.
And then on top of that you’d have to whack on the cost of Muskrat Falls power which Dunderdale estimated to be between 14.3 and 16.5 cents per kilowatt hour.
But with all the public concern over rate increases, Dunderdale is now not so sure about her projections. As the Labradorian reported:
“The project is not advanced enough at this point to determine with that degree of accuracy what you are going to pay per kilowatt hour in 2017.”
She said at the average rate of increase of 5 percent per year, Newfoundlanders could expect to get about the same bill on current power in 2017 as they would under the Muskrat Falls hydropower with similar rates of increase.
Not advanced enough to determine with that degree of accuracy.
Riiiight.
And yet last fall, Kathy had great confidence that the prices would be exactly as she described. After all it was the absolutely concrete, cast-in-stone, sure-as-Danny-made-little-green-apples certainty of the energy price forecasts that justified upping the gross public debt by about 50% of its current level.
And now Dunderdale can’t be sure what domestic electricity prices will be when the dam is finished in 2017.
That’s a gigantic change in just a few short weeks.
Expect more changes if the public starts paying more attention to what Danny Williams Legacy Dam will cost them.
- srbp -
- srbp -
Edited version of the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Board news release:
The public is invited to comment on the draft scoping document for the Environmental Assessment of an exploration well being proposed by Corridor Resources within Exploration License 1105 (the Old Harry Prospect) located in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, offshore Newfoundland and Labrador.
The proposed activity includes drilling one exploration well within EL 1105 using a mobile offshore drilling unit (MODU), that is, semi-submersible drilling rig or drill ship, supply vessels, and offshore helicopters. Vertical seismic profiling (VSP) activities may also be conducted in conjunction with the drilling activities. Corridor Resources proposes to drill one exploration well between 2012 and 2014.
Before any petroleum-related activity can be undertaken in the Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Area, a detailed and location-specific Environmental Assessment (EA) must be submitted to the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board (C-NLOPB). In addition, this project is subject to the federal environmental assessment process pursuant to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEA Act).
Pursuant to paragraph 18(3) of the CEA Act, the C-NLOPB as the responsible authority for the federal environmental assessment of the project is inviting the public to comment on the proposed draft scoping document prepared by the C-NLOPB.
Comments must be received by the C-NLOPB no later than Monday, March 28, 2011. Interested persons may submit their comments in the official language of their choice to information@cnlopb.nl.ca or to the following address:
Public Comments – Old Harry Project
Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board
5th Floor, TD Place
140 Water St., St. John’s, NL A1C 6H6
(709) 778-1400
- srbp -
Fisheries minister Clyde Jackman is running as fast as he can from a fisheries restructuring report that recommends restructuring the fishery.
This is not a surprise for a minister who appeared clueless on the issues in his own portfolio when he admitted first receiving the report.
This is not a surprise given that the current administration like pretty well all its predecessors of either blue or red persuasion have run from meaningful fisheries reform as fast as their little legs could carry them.
The only change in the past year seems to be that the industry has gone from midway up sh**t creek to being pretty close to the headwaters.
Bottom line: we are still in an election year with a Tory leadership out there waiting to get settled afterward. No politician of any political stripe is going to advocate what needs to happen (the report would be a good starting point) under either of those circumstances. And for the Tories in power, they have a double reason to stay as short-sighted as they can.
Anyone still wonder why Danny left in such a gigantic hurry?
- srbp -