In their last year in office, the provincial Conservatives went on a patronage bend on top of the patronage bender they started in 2003. They came into office promising reform and - you guessed it - did exactly the opposite. If there is no greater fraud than a promise not kept, then then Old Man and his cronies were the biggest political fraudsters in the history of political fraud.
We told you about this
last July when Paul Davis appointed political operative John Ottenheimer to replace political operative Len Simms as head of the provincial government's housing corporation. After the Ottenheimer appointment, Davis and the Conservatives kept going with the questionable appointments. The swap of the chief judge in Provincial Court remains highly suspicious and unexplained, as does the sudden firing of the High Sheriff. The former is one the new Liberal administration genuinely could not do anything about. The former High Sheriff is now suing the provincial government for wrongful dismissal.
The Liberals could have and should have done something about all the others. It was a way of setting a new tone for their administration and demonstrating that things that are wrong cannot stand. For some unknown reason, Dwight Ball would not commit to reversing the Ottenheimer appointment - on principle - when Davis made it a year ago. When he took office, Dwight Ball decided to leave not only Ottenheimer but all the other Conservatives appointees in place. And when he unveiled the new appointments commission, Ball had a third opportunity to set a new standard for government appointments by getting rid of the old, wrong ones.
He didn't.
Now, Ball has punted
John Ottenheimer. We do not know why. No one from the provincial government did any interviews. The minister responsible for the housing corporation issued a
news release announcing Ottenheimer's replacement. Everything else that we know - including the size of Ottenheimer's severance - came from Ottenheimer himself.