Shortly after he took office a month or so ago, newly appointed information commissioner Donovan Molloy told CBC there had been a "
substantial increase" in the number of access to information requests since 2015 when the House of Assembly passed a new access to information law.
True, said the always accurate
labradore, but that was only in relation to the two years when Bill 29 seems to have reduced the number of requests. People had filed 343 access requests up to the first part of August. That would work out to about "800-and-some requests
completed for the year," according to
labradore, "which would be something of a surge compared
to Bill 29 levels, and even, to a lesser degree, compared to pre-29 levels.*
"But, apart from a hypothetical surge during the balance of the fiscal year, the
statistics do not support the Commissioner’s concerns. ... To the extent that there
has been a surge in request volume since the 2015 unravelling of Bill 29, that
may just as easily be accounted for by the fact that, in the post-Bill-29 era,
the public is simply more aware of their right to access public records, and,
thanks to the elimination of application fees and the praiseworthy creation of
an online filing system, more able to exercise that right."
Those comments are a good starting point, though for a couple of posts on the current state of the province's access to information law. What you will see in this two-part series is that there are enormous obstacles to public access to government information. The obstacles come from the way bureaucrats apply the law. They produce their own problems and, in one of the most serious obstacles, illegal censorship gets the seal of approval from the province's information access watchdog.