Moody’s delivered a clear and serious message to the Government of
Newfoundland and Labrador on Wednesday night by lowering the government’s
credit rating. The credit rating action
came after a series of consistent warnings by Moody’s since it last lowered the
government’s rating of credit-worthiness in 2016.
Wednesday’s downgrade suggests that Moody’s has doubts the provincial
government can hit its target of balancing the provincial budget by 2022. While Moody’s changed its trending to stable
from negative, bear in mind that Moody’s
rating period ends before the government’s budget period expires. It doesn’t mean – as both finance minister Tom Osborne and NDP leader Alison Coffin
suggested on Thursday - that everything
is fine.
In a news
release issued on 24 July 2019, Moody’s cited three major reasons for the
downgrade:
- “Newfoundland and Labrador's elevated debt and interest burdens”,
- “continued expectation of material consolidated deficits over the next 2 years”, as well as
- “heightened credit risk stemming from the large debt level and weak financial metrics of Nalcor, the province's wholly owned utility, which raises the likelihood the province will need to provide financial support to, or assume debt service from, Nalcor.”
Finance minister Tom Osborne dismissed the downgrade, telling reporters
that the downgrade was “not a reason for alarm” and “nothing to be alarmed
about”. Osborne said lenders were not surprised by the action, which would be
true since both the warnings from Moody’s and the province’s failure to heed
them have been well known for two years.
Osborne *is* whistling past the financial graveyard here as he responds
to the short-term political imperatives of his own party as opposed to the
longer-term interests of the province.
As SRBP noted in
January, the provincial government abandoned its deficit plan from 2016
within 18 months of starting it. The spring budget understated the government’s
financial state.
The motivation was purely political just as the reaction to Moody’s is
political. “If re-elected,” SRBP noted before
the May election, “Dwight
Ball is unlikely to make any changes to the government’s current trajectory
unless forced to do so. The members of the Liberal caucus, primarily interested
in securing their pensions and possibly becoming ministers in a post-Ball Liberal
administration, would have no interest in doing anything that would jeopardise
their political future.”