An eagle-eyed e-mail correspondent noted that Charlene Johnson's announcement of green public buildings was announced about a year ago.
What was it Danny Williams said about that business of announcing old announcements so that it appears like more money than is actually there?
Oh yeah:
"But to come in and double- and triple-announce money, that's giving the appearance of being new money, that's misleading...".
We couldn't agree more.
It's misleading.
-srbp-
The odd thing about municipal affairs minister Dave Denine's comments on the provincial government's unsprinklered hospitals is that it is exactly what privately-owned personal care home operators said about their own facilities.
In fact, they didn't say it themselves. They worked it out with officials of the health department. Extra staff. Special evacuation procedures, pretty much everything that Denine says about hospitals and nursing homes operated by the government.
Bear in mind, too that people in the government facilities are considerably less mobile than the people in most of the personal care homes. Think bed-ridden versus using a walker or cane.
It's funny how perspective changes when you make the rules for things you operate versus making the rules others have to live by.
Denine on personal care homes:
"This has come to the point that we just couldn't continue on any longer," Denine told reporters in Corner Brook, where the provincial cabinet has been meeting.
"The timeframe has come and gone when this should be done…. This has to be moved forward for life safety issues."
Denine on government operations:
"They know what they have to do in case of emergency. There [are] fire doors there that help prevent fire from spreading, and the fire commissioner's office is satisfied that all necessary precautions are in place," Denine said.
And when will the sprinklers be installed?
Denine said the government has classified all the hospitals as a high priority, and that they will either have new sprinkler systems installed, or the buildings will be replaced over time.
That's pretty much what the personal care home operators did. The last 22 were doing it as well when Denine and his colleague Ross Wiseman decided to get self-righteous. At least one of the 22 homes was finishing the installation when the closure order was delivered. Another was sorting out the last details of building a completely new facility.
And health officials knew all about it before the orders were delivered.
Sounds like a poll stunt as much as the evident hypocrisy.
An update involving a sprinkling of uncomfortable phrases: The provincial fire commissioner has either been gagged or has muzzled himself but late on Thursday, he issued a news release indicating he was "comfortable" with the fire safety situations at 71 provincially-owned health facilities.
He's "comfortable."
That's such a wonderful, meaningless phrase.
Now aside from the fact fire commissioner Fred Hollett has been kept under lock and key since this whole hospital scandal broke, it's a bit hard to take this news release as anything other than an effort to get out from under the weight of the scandal.
It is severely lacking in credibility from the get go, and the content doesn't help. There's even a table that is supposed to provide some background information on the fire commissioners opinion.
Notice the crucial bits of data that are missing.
Like when was the building last inspected by someone from the fire commissioners office. Of the 10 sites listed, six show as being inspected only on request of the agency operating the building and there's absolutely no indication when they were last inspected at all.
Only four show the date of the last inspection. Of those, three were inspected in 2006, with at least one of those having last been inspected almost two years ago.
It's nice to know Fred Hollett - no relation, by the way - is comfortable with all that. it's nice but it's totally irrelevant.
When it comes to the safety of the sick and elderly, most of us think hard facts and proof are more important than Fred's emotional state.
And what else is there? A claim that government has spent $128 million over the past four years on "new health infrastructure and capital repairs and maintenance, including fire sprinkler systems...". You see, as soon as a news release supposedly about the fire commissioner's professional opinion starts quoting a cabinet minister talking about how much money government has spent, you know you have an old fashioned bit of knob-polishing going on.
You see that phrase includes purchases of major pieces of capital equipment like MRIs.
That sort of stuff - paid for with federal cash - doesn't explain why Eastern Health went looking for money to deal with critical and near critical issues totalling $90 million and got a mere $3. million.
When the facts aren't on your side, you issue a release like this and start ordering Kiwi turd-coloured polish by the case.
-srbp-
Charlene Johnson announces renovations to government buildings as part of an energy efficiency move.
Good announcement.
Read down towards the end of the news release, though to find out the money is entirely federal cash under an energy efficiency program.
Any bets that Dave Denine and Ross Wiseman are wondering if they can call a cease fire in the ABC campaign to see if Steve's got some cash to fix up hospitals?
-srbp-
There are a few people in Newfoundland and Labrador who think that the 1927 Privy Council border between Labrador and Quebec has been changed.
It hasn't.
The 1927 border is the legal border between Labrador and Quebec.
What has some people upset is a recent map of Quebec (left), issued by the Quebec provincial government, which shows two borders on the southern portion.
The 1927 border is clearly marked.
The other one - to the north of it - represents where the border might be if one amended the 1927 decision to encompass the headwaters of rivers that flow south.
Basically the Privy Council determined the boundary of Labrador took in all land from the headwaters of rivers flowing into the Atlantic. On the portion flowing generally southward to the St. Lawrence, they didn't apply the same rule. The Privy Council drew a line across the parallel, hence the straight portion shown clearly on the map.
Legally, that's the border.
The 1927 one.
The Government of Quebec can draw as many pictures as it wants. Unless and until the Quebec government tries to exercise legal jurisdiction north of that 1927 line, there isn't an issue.
And they won't do that because, while they draw pretty pictures, Quebec lawyers know where the border is.
They even mark it on their maps: Trace de 1927.
And those people who insist the border is changed? Well, they are a bit like people who run around looking for Sasquatch. They "know" it's there and they keep hunting for evidence. They haven't turned up any evidence, but they keep looking for it all the same.
They don't turn up any evidence because, as most people know, the Sasquatch doesn't exist except in drawings people made up.
-srbp-
The Reuters version:
CALGARY, Alberta (Reuters) - Royal Dutch Shell Plc's Canadian unit is hunting for a partner willing to take a stake in an expensive exploration play off the coast of Newfoundland.
Shell Canada Energy is looking for a company willing to farm into its 20 percent stake in the Orphan Basin exploration play. Any successful bidder would pay drilling costs in return for an interest in the properties.
"We are simply looking to see if there are parties interested in sharing the cost and risks of our interest in the next Orphan well," Jeff Mann, a spokesman for Shell, said on Wednesday.
Shell Canada, the Canadian arm of the European oil and gas major, holds the stake in a 21,250 square kilometer (8,205 square mile) block in the basin, 350 kilometers off the East coast of the Canadian province. Chevron Corp (holds 50 percent, while Exxon Mobil Corp and Imperial Oil Ltd each have 15 percent.
The partners have already drilled one well at the play at a cost that some reports have pegged at more than C$200 million ($202 million), while a second is expected to be drilled this year. Water depths in the region range from 1,500 meters to 3,000 meters (0.93 to 1.9 miles).
The Newfoundland government expects that the basin could yield fields containing more than 1 billion barrels of oil.
($1=$0.99 Canadian)
(Reporting by Scott Haggett; Editing by Peter Galloway)
Superfast Update: Shell and ExxonMobil are also selling oil and gas interests in the Dutch North Sea.
Shell was also turned down for approval from American securities regulators to list Alberta tar sands interests among its assets. That leaves the company with an apparently weak reserve replenishment ratio. Regulators are reportedly concerned the tar sands represent a high risk of project failure.
The SEC [Securities Exchange Commission] has so far refused permission for Shell to book tar sands, believing that there is a high risk of projects failing.
-srbp-
Premier Danny Williams announced a formal agreement to expand White Rose.
Cool.
Reported by AOL Money, based on a Canadian Press story dated on March 4, 2008.
Not last December, when the "formal agreement" was announced, sans any mention of acquisition price for the shares. Not a "final and binding agreement', mind you. A formal one. That must be a contract in white tie and tails.
Or last September, when the telephone deal - the "informal" one solely for campaign purposes? - got dropped in the middle of a speech.
And it certainly wasn't earlier in September when the province approved White Rose expansion. Note the difference between White Rose and Hibernia South.
Hmmm.
Very curious.
Since the companies involved here are publicly traded - that is, unlike PetroNewf - there are some restrictions about making announcements over and over again so it seems a little odd this deal has been announced now two or three times.
Someone should ask Danny for a copy of the "memorandum of understanding, the "formal" agreement and the "final" agreement, and any other agreements signed by the province's oil company.
Oh yes, and while you're at it, see if you can find out the real acquisition price for the White Rose shares.
Hands up anyone who thinks it was more than the $44 million originally announced.
-srbp-
The chickens are coming home to roost.
The cows are coming home,too.
Early on Wednesday morning government and union officials are expressing surprise at the layoff of 50 workers at Hibernia.
They shouldn't be.
They've known it was coming since Kathy Dunderdale - on Danny Williams' orders - cancelled Hibernia South. She did so on the flimsiest of flimsy excuses, not the least of which was acknowledging that she and her officials had failed in their duty to gather information until it was way too late. The subsequent exchange of correspondence with the offshore regulatory board showed Dunderdale's arguments were weak, if not downright phony.
You see, with Hibernia South, the drilling program at the province's first offshore field was pretty much done. Whatever was left could be handled by one of the two drill derricks on the platform. The Hibernia Management and Development Company knew it. Provincial government officials should have known - but that can't be assumed given past admissions of obvious things missed. Everyone else knew it because it's in the documents filed at the offshore board over the past two decades ago and long since a public document.
Had the provincial government closed the deal on Hibernia South development, we wouldn't be seeing these layoffs. We also would be seeing the increased capital expenditure over the next two years that would help offset the downturn in the economy, until Hebron construction cuts in.
And that's what Wade Locke said a year ago and what he's repeated just this week in the Chronicle Herald.
Here's what he said in February 2007, right on the heels of Dunderdale's offshore blunder;
With all four fields being developed to their potential, provincial revenue from the oil and gas sector would peak at $1.4 billion in 2012, generate more than $1.0 billion to the provincial treasury for another 12 years [beyond that] and yield in excess of $500 million per year for at least another eight years. ...
However, at this point the following caveat is important to bear in mind: these tremendous impacts may never be realized. They are contingent on Hibernia South and the Hebron project proceeding. If these developments do not proceed, then the revenue from the oil and gas industry will fall from $23 billion to $9 billion. In other words, while enhanced prosperity is within our grasp, there is a real risk it may not be realized. Furthermore, this risk is directly affected by decisions that are within the control of the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. [Emphasis added]
And here's what he said just this week in discussing this province becoming a "have' one in 2009;
But all of this is based on the assumption that further oil projects at South Hibernia and Hebron move ahead after being stalled in negotiations between oil companies and the Newfoundland and Labrador government.
"Right now, it’s important to get an agreement on South Hibernia," said Mr. Locke.
"This is important for continuity of revenue flow to government and the industry while waiting for Hebron to get started. South Hibernia is worth in excess of $20 billion alone. I find it hard to believe that two parties can’t come to an agreement on how to share $20 billion, . . . but I’m sure it will happen and I base my calculations on that."
That's not happening, however.
Hebron still isn't signed. There's no official explanation but Danny Williams has tried to suggest the oil companies are slow in their approvals process.
There might be another contributing factor: Danny doesn't have the cash to meet the financial commitments, that is without driving the province in debt.
Anybody wonder why Danny didn't just up and pay for all those needed hospital renovations this week?
Forget that for three budget cycles during which ministers did nothing about it. Why didn't the premier do what he usually does in these cases: whip out the chequebook and make the boo boo go away?
Well, for one thing the provincial government is looking at a period of flat-lined or decreasing revenues. If oil prices drop this year, as expected, there'll be a drop. If the US economy slows down, there'll be a drop.
At the same time, Williams and his colleagues have busily built up expectations and swollen public spending as if the boom of the past couple of years could go on forever. They seemed to believe their own publicity that indeed with the second coming of the mortal saviour, everything was different, that somehow, all the problems the province was facing were due to sheer incompetence of everyone who went before.
They've also faced increased expenses due to a growing economy. Ask anyone who has tried to due house repairs. Costs have gone up. Fuel prices are up and the costs of materials is up. And all those construction workers who'd be in the housing industry waiting for Hebron which was about to start two years ago until Danny canned it? Well, they've hightailed it to Alberta too. Altogether capital costs have shot up. It's unavoidable in the economic climate the provincial government has created through its offshore decisions.
Except they thought they were different.
And all those polls did was reinforce that sense of arrogance.
And pride.
But pride doesn't meet the bills.
At the same time as forecast lowered revenues and demands on the public treasury that exceed the revenues, there's an obvious tussle within the administration about finances. That debt clock Tom Marshall is carrying around is aimed squarely at anyone in his own cabinet who might want to spend hundreds of millions, perhaps by borrowing. Borrowing increases the debt and increasing the debt is not good for a whole bunch of reasons.
Danny Williams is throwing token cash at the hospitals scandal because he doesn't have any more. he's facing an unalterable cash commitment at White Rose. The acquisition cost is significantly higher than forecast. So is the provincial share of capital costs because the capital costs are higher.
And Hebron? Well, every day the deal isn't signed and oil prices stay high, the acquisition cost is considerably higher than the $110 originally forecast. Every day the deal isn't signed the capital cost commitments go up just a that much more and those are capital expenditures that can't be avoided.
It's not like a hospital, which you own and control and which doesn't have sprinklers. With the hospital you can plan to spend 414 million on all hospitals even though the ones in St. John's alone need $70 million in critical repairs. And then when the secret reports get leaked accidentally, you boost the $14 to $20 million but it's still tokenism because you can make those decisions.
But Hebron? There are timelines to be met. Hard and fast timelines. There's nasty partners who expect you to pay your bills on time, especially considering the unholy grief you put them through for your tiny piece of the action with no management rights.
Danny Williams has cash enough to meet expenses, he just doesn't have enough cash to meet the things that need to be done and to meet the other obligations he's built up over the past three years but that don't really need to be done.
At the same time, delays in offshore projects are producing results - real, undeniable results - that were known and predicted at the time projects were cancelled or needlessly delayed. Go back and look at what's been written here: you'll find it all.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what's going on.
The entire freakin' barnyard is headed back to the barn.
-srbp-
When voter turnout drops to a mere 41% from the already abysmal 44.7%, there's no reason for any news story to write about increasing a share of popular vote.
This link happens to be to a CBC story; undoubtedly other media will take up the same general approach.
Why wouldn't they? it's standard political reporting, and to make it worse they can quote political scientists who speak in terms of a stunning victory.
Yet, not a single one seems the least bit curious as to why 60% of the electorate stayed home.
That's a pretty significant question especially given this description of Alberta:
Driven by the booming oilsands, the province is grappling with major growth pressures, including a lack of affordable housing and aging infrastructure, as well as balancing environmental concerns with the massive oilsands developments.
Ed Stelmach won.
But 60% of Albertans didn't vote, let alone vote for him.
-srbp-
And those are words from a guy who likes Danny.
Now admittedly, the guy hadn't seen NTV news on Friday night or seen the Telegram coverage, so he was only commenting on Paul Oram's version of the attack on Lorraine Michael.
So when the opposition does its job the Government, or at least one of its ministers throws out the threat of not supporting providing the money needed to offer opposition. I have to say it was not a classy move on Oram’s part. Petty, mean and intimidating. The Premier should put him on a leash.
R'uh R'oh.
'Cause here's where the whole thing started:
“Lorraine Michael is out calling on us to do this and do that, and saying she’ll be annoyed with government if we don’t get this done,” the premier told The Telegram late Friday.
“By way of interest, you should know this — Lorraine Michael now has a request in to the management committee (at the House of Assembly) for a raise. So here is the champion of the people out there, who’s calling on the government to do this and do that, and now, after all the heat over MHA salaries … has come back and looked for a special raise as leader of the New Democratic Party.”
That's gotta hurt something, especially when the piece goes back to the standard government Blackberry line right at the end, even if the excuse of blaming it all on Harper contradicts everything that preceded it:
That said the stepping stone, the $10 Billion carrot dangled in front of us and than cruelly yanked away by Ottawa would repair a lot of hospitals, roads, bridges, schools, sewers, water supplies and allow us to pay down our debt while we are in a positive cash flow position. Spending all of our surpluses to catch up on generations of under funding is going to leave us more reliant on the federal government when our non-renewable resources are depleted than we ever were.
You see, the provincial government has had growing income of its own for the past four years. The surpluses are not the growth: they are a sign of how massive the growth has been. They are also a clue has to how the provincial government's spending has grown over the same time period. There's been more money spent in the past three years than at any time in the province's history ever. Newfoundland and Labrador spends more per capita on government operations than every provincial government in Canada except for Alberta.
And on top of that growth in budgeted spending, the cash surpluses (the money left over on annual operating budgets at the end of the year), have totalled almost $2.0 billion in 2005, 2006 and 2007 combined.
Yes, the cash coming in the door on top of what was forecast has actually been as much as the entire one-shot transfer from Ottawa's coffers in 2005.
So even with all the growth in public spending and with all the surpluses piling up, the provincial government still opted not to repair critical health care infrastructure, even though it clearly had the cash.
Randy Simms made Paul Oram look foolish because Simms wasn't talking about "[s]pending all our surpluses." He was talking about budgeting. And he wasn't talking about chronic under-funding: that suggests the prior governments had the cash but opted not to spend it.
Dead wrong, and even wronger - if that's possible - considering that those words came from a former executive assistant to a cabinet minister. As he should know, until now the provincial government often had to face a drop in revenues every year. Often, provincial governments didn't have money to meet existing needs and normal inflation. Having a windfall of almost a billion dollars was unthinkable and having such a bonus on top of huge growth in revenue anyway was the stuff of wild fantasy. "Underfunded" only works if you understand the word means "didn't have the cash to do things with in the first place."
But that's not what he meant, clearly.
Nope, trotting out the "promise" myth is just like the attack on Lorraine Michael; it's just a subtle version of the same kind of distraction. The provincial government doesn't want a discussion in public of spending priorities based on accurate information. Open, informed public discussion - like a sitting legislature - gets in the way of government doing whatever it wishes.
What the "promise" fable returned to in that post is actually what Paul Oram was trying to do: make excuses for why government did what it did. Oram went on at length trying to explain why there were more demands on government cash than there was cash.
Yada, yada, yada.
Yeah and if Harper...
The attack on Michael is a scurrilous personal attack, but the goal remains the same.
It's all just a distraction.
Pretty fast update:
Well, your humble e-scribbler and two others pointed out the obvious, namely that the Premier actually started the attack.
The response?
Well the Premier needs a better attack dog because Oram never pulled it off very well.
-srbp-
Finance minister Tom Marshall likes his debt clock. That's a little electronic thingy that ratchets up to show how much money is being spent servicing the public debt.
It's good to mention the debt and to commit to a plan to pay down debt, but when debt servicing accounts for only 10% of your annual outlay, it's a bit disingenuous - there's that word again - to talk about debt like it was the biggest problem facing cabinet.
But it's funny in all the talk about money that the fin min doesn't talk about the escalating cost of starting up the provincial oil company.
He doesn't make a passing reference but doesn't note it as an escalating cost:
Marshall said about $350 million of that surplus will be spent on infrastructure. More than $100 million will be used to buy an interest in offshore oil developments.
The only equity outlay in the current fiscal year is for White Rose. Hebron isn't done yet. White Rose is actually ramping up. Hebron 's final agreement - and therefore the final costs - haven't been sorted out yet.
So "more than $100 million for White Rose" then.
When the project was announced initially, the actual cost of buying the 4.9% interest was pegged at $44 million.
That's it.
$44 million.
Marshall just told us that White Rose will now cost almost three times what we were told.
And before you get all excited, the so-called "handling fee" on every barrel of oil associated with the provincial shares doesn't get factored in there.
First of all, it's a fee that gets applied when the oil is pumped.
Second of all, even if we stupidly agreed to pay it in advance, that still only works to about another $38 million. That still adds up to less than $100 million.
Third of all, the initial capital costs and operating cost shares also don't drive that number to "more than $100 million". The first extension is set to cost around $600 million or so. take 5% of that and add it on.
In order to get the White Rose acquisition costs over $100 million we'd either have to pay every fee and charge up front, even before the work was done, or there's something else going on.
The something else might be in the discrepancy between the initial announcement of the deal and the final one. In the first version, we were told the acquisition price of $44 million subject to "due diligence", reservoir verification and so on. In the second version - when the final agreement was done - the acquisition price mysteriously disappeared.
Gone.
Vanished.
Not discussed.
Maybe someone should ask the finance minister what exactly that equity cost actually is. It sure doesn't look like what we were told first.
It might well be that every day the Hebron deal goes unsigned, the cost of the project is also escalating beyond what we were originally told.
-srbp-
Try "Minister of Finance."
The provincial finance minister is on CBC bright and early Monday morning picking up a theme he started a week or so ago while on the road with his budget roadshow.
Seems that the provincial government is running into cost over-runs on its capital works budget.
Not surprising at all. Costs for building supplies, gasoline and so forth have all increased.
But Marshall talks about how the current surplus, of nearly a billion dollars, is being spent.
Marshall said about $350 million of that surplus [of $880 million] will be spent on infrastructure. More than $100 million will be used to buy an interest in offshore oil developments.
That's not really the whole story though. Minister Marshall should note - as he has in the past - that the $350 million is actually not extra spending. It's just replacing money the provincial government planned to borrow to do whatever capital works they had in the pipeline. It's not that there's anything wrong with spending the cash instead of borrowing; it's just a little misleading not to make it plain that, despite an unheard of surplus, no new infrastructure work is being done.
of course, the rising cost of infrastructure has nothing to do with why Mr. Marshall and his colleagues kept a report secret for three years that documented the sorry state of city hospitals.
Oh yes. And why they did nothing about the report's contents, except hide them.
-srbp-
The losers get stupid.
Hilary Clinton's campaign is in trouble so her team produces a beautiful 30 second television spot. It's just a tiny bit more sophisticated than the famous anti-Goldwater spot from the '64 campaign, but not by much.
Problem: It's a great ad for John McCain. Someone who already knows the world's leaders, who knows the military and who has been tested before? Yep a navy pilot who's been in combat, spent time in a North Vietnamese prison and who has been around the block more times than Monica's little blue dress.
Sometimes in politics, when the going gets tough, the losers get desperate or in this case stupid, which adds up to the same thing.
For good measure, here's the classic "Daisy" spot from the 1964 campaign. LBJ versus Goldwater.
When people talk about attack ads, this is the grandmother of them all.
But notice that it was aimed outward from LBJ, instead inward, as in the Hilary spot.
Nice concept. Wrong client.
And even if it is suppose to be a pre-emptive strike, it's hardly good strategy to shoot yourself in the foot before someone else shoots you.
-srbp-
Uppus datum: Charles Cheeseman made some valid comments on this original posted and he linked to Obama's response spot. Incidentally, do yourself a big favour and go visit Charles own' blog.
The Obama response is another reason why Clinton's spot turned out to be a dud.
For starters, Obama got to take a simple line: "It's judgment that matters." But look at the spot and you'll see a bunch of other smart, simple things. For example, it steals the opening visuals from Hilary. Then it rams them down her throat by showing Obama with visuals and a voice over that talk of his security background.
Notice especially the reference to Obama working with Luger on arms control.
That would be Republican Senator Richard Luger from Indiana. Security initiatives, apparently blessed by a stalwart Republican and all of this airing in a state where security and Republicans are big. Heck, even Texas Democrats make Stephen Harper look like a wimp.
This spot really plays well to Obama's strengths. Yes, he's a Democrat, but he appeals to moderate Republicans and Independents much like Clinton and other Southern Democrats have tended to do.
And if all that wasn't enough, the thing is done cheaply and quickly. You gotta like that: on time, on target and under budget.
Consider as well, that in the current polling Obama and Clinton are in a tight race among Texas Democrats.
The latest poll has Clinton ahead in Ohio, but tied with Obama in Texas. That pretty much runs the same in other recent polling.
Obama's spot might be a shade more effective because his message is simple and right in front of your face.
Clinton's is a bit too subtle. Add to that the data in the second poll link She already owns "experience" as a quality and experience was the second most important quality among those voters polled.
She gets her doors blown off by Obama as the "change" candidate, but on the issues question, they are tied. What Hilary needed in Texas - if this polling is accurate - was something demonstrate that she and the voters were speaking the same language on the same issues.
It's a fundamental strategic question: where do you put your effort, since resources are always limited? If Clinton needs to pick up votes, she's not going to get them by playing to a point she already dominates. Bear in mind that in that same polling, her identified supporters are pretty much solid in their choice. Obama's aren't as solid. Once you hit a certain number - like 93% - it gets progressively harder and harder to win every additional point.
Solely from the standpoint of cost-effectiveness, it's more profitable to put energy somewhere else. It's like running as a candidate for the Liberals or the New Democrats federally in St. John's. The Tory vote is pretty much a solid block. Play up your Tory credentials or sound like a Tory in the mistaken belief you need to be a Tory to win the seat and you are pretty much wasting your time. More people vote against Tories federally than vote for 'em. Tories usually win because the non-Tory vote is split. There are way more votes to be had with far less effort and cost on the left than on the right.
Lots of candidates make those strategic errors.
let's see after the Texas primary whether Hilary chose wisely or not.
Despite posting record operating surpluses in each of the three years since it received reports on the needed repairs and life safety improvement province's hospitals, the Williams administration planned to increase spending on hospital repairs by just two million dollars in its upcoming budget.
The plan was to spend $14 million instead of the $12 million budgeted in those three record surplus years.
That is until news broke this week of the problems.
Now, according to Premier Danny Williams , that $14 million will be increased to somewhere between $20 to $28 million. Williams said $14 million of that will go to the four sites in St. John's, including the provincial health centre at the Health Sciences Centre.
You can read about it on the front page of today's Telegram. Williams comments were also reported on NTV News on Friday evening.
Previously secret consultant's reports were released this week by the provincial health department after health minister Ross Wiseman inadvertently referred to them. The assessments, completed in 2005 showed that four St. John's area health centres required $134 million in required repairs. over half that amount - $70 million - was classified as currently or potentially critical.
The provincial allocation for St. John's amounts to just 20% of the amount identified as critical or potentially critical just three years ago. In the meantime, the situations have deteriorated and the costs have increased. According to CBC, which broke the hospital scandal earlier this week, the bill for St. John's hospitals could top $170 million if all work was done this year.
"It's growing faster than we can keep ahead of it," said Keith Bowden, director of infrastructure and support for Eastern Health, the regional authority that manages all hospitals and clinics in the city area, as well as the rest of eastern Newfoundland.
"I mean, we're not keeping ahead of the curve at all."
The reports on the St. John's hospitals were kept secret despite a written commitment from Williams in his 2003 campaign manual to release government-commissioned reports within 30 days of receipt and to have an action plan made public within 60 days to address the reports.
Reports on other hospitals in the province - so-called facilities reports - may also exist.
According to provincial finance department figures, the Williams administration posted a $524 million surplus on its operating budgets for 2005 (capital and current) and a $141 million surplus in 2006. In 2007, the surplus is projected to be more than $880 million yet while the finance minister and the health minister knew of the hospitals problem, the surplus was redirected to other spending, including covering some of the costs of creating a government-owned oil and gas company.
In the Telegram, Williams defended his health minister saying that Wiseman didn't create the problems. 'We inherited this and we inherited a mess," Williams said. While that's true Williams' administration also hasn't done anything to deal with the problem and obviously hadn't planned to do anything until the secret reports were uncovered by media inquiries.
For his part, Williams denied knowing anything about the reports. Given the Premier's penchant for nano-management, his claim seems odd but if we take him at his word - there's no reason not to - Williams has now pointed to a far more sinister problem within his administration.
If Williams is correct, three successive ministers of health, including the man he just appointed to head the energy company's board of directors withheld crucial information from him and potentially other members of cabinet.
Williams claim suggests a fundamental breakdown in the operations of cabinet government in the province. Ministers cannot properly make crucial decisions, such as government spending, if details of major issues are hidden from them. The secrecy cloak that apparently kept these reports from the public also applies within government too, if Williams' comments are accepted at face value.
Opposition parties were highly critical of the Williams' administration handling of the hospital scandal this week.
"This report has sat on the desk of three ministers," [Liberal health critic Roland] Butler said.
"Yes, the debt has to be looked after," said Butler, who said Health Minister Ross Wiseman should be lobbying Finance Minister Tom Marshall, "trying to find out if he can get the money to correct those serious issues, sooner rather than later."
New Democratic Party leader Lorraine Michael called on Williams to relieve Wiseman in light of his performance on a serious of scandals within the department. In an interview with NTV news, Williams attacked Michael personally, claiming she was being hypocritical to criticize Wiseman when she herself had been looking for a raise from the House of Assembly management committee.
There's no logical connection between the two issues, but the attack was a trademark Williams' personal smear.
Update: CBC has other examples of repairs needed in hospitals around the province. Seems there are hospitals without sprinkler systems.
CBC's Deanne Fleet reported on this in the Friday news cast. Neither the fire commissioner nor municipal affairs minister Dave Denine were available Friday to take questions on the growing controversy. Denine and health minister Ross Wiseman dropped the regulatory hammer on 22 personal care homes in the province just three weeks ago for not having sprinklers installed.
Operators, who had been warned of the sprinkler issue in 2003, were given just 30 days to install systems or get signed contracts for installation or face immediate closure.
You can likely figure out Fleet's questions to the fire commissioner and to Denine.
-srbp-
From Macleans, a story on resettlement along the Lower North Shore.
Aylmer Sound is an isolated, anglophone community. The town's down to four residents and those four will soon be gone as the province cuts off services. The provincial government has offered financial incentives to get people to move to nearby communities.
There is no road into the town. As you will hear in this little slide show Martin Patriquin had to take a $1200 Air Labrador flight - yeah, that's right 12 hundred bucks - into a nearby town and then head overland.
Maybe you'd have better luck than your humble e-scribbler figuring out the fare on Air Labrador's website for an imaginary flight from St. John's to La Tabatiere, the nearest airport to Aylmer Sound.
Accept the start dates offered by the system which, presumably are dates the airline flies into the community and you get back a message saying there are no flights on those dates.
Air Labrador is owned by the Pike Group of companies, whose head offices are in St. John's.
-srbp-
Celebrations to mark the founding of Cupids, the first English colony in what is now Canada, are expected to generate $15 million of economic activity in the celebration year, 2010.
That's it.
$15 million.
And the nationalist-sounding, go-it-alone provincial government is willing to contribute the amazing sum of $2.0 million to the celebrations.
Whoopeee.
Yeah, Whoppee-ding.
Now, it seems that an event as significant as the 400th anniversary of the first English colony would be a fairly big deal not just locally but nationally. The fact it happens to fall in an Olympic year doesn't bode particularly well for Cupids being the top tourist attraction in Canada that year, but it might make out all right.
It might make out if the provincial government actually paid any attention to the project. For starters there's the tiny sum they've thrown into the planning for it. When you are pulling in $2.0 billion in oil and mineral revenues and running billion dollar surpluses, $2.0 million bucks just doesn't say "serious".
And bear in mind that's not $2.0 million over each of the next two years.
Nope.
That's $2.0 million, in total.
Doesn't sound very serious at all.
That's why it is getting tedious to listen to tourism minister Clyde Jackman rabbit on about how tremendously important these celebrations in Cupids are and why it is so important for the federal Conservative members of parliament to stand up for their province and wrestle federal funding for the whole thing.
It's tedious just writing a sentence that encapsulates the windy minister's windy complaint.
The whole thing would be a lot less tedious, though, if Jackman's boss would actually allow him to give some serious cash to match the serious level of whining coming from the provincial tourism minister.
And that's what it is: whining. That's all it is.
You see if the provincial government were that serious about Cupids, it would have tossed in more cash of its own up front. There'd have been great talk three years ago about the fantabulous festival in Cupids or some such. We'd be Cupidsed to death just as we were cabotted in 1997 or impaled on Viking helmets another year.
And there'd have been cash. Not two million in total, but two million a year to a maximum of eight or 10 or whatever the thing would cost.
You see, Jackman made mention several times of the Quebec City celebrations marking the 400th anniversary of that city. Jackman mentioned it in his talk radio calls today and in a news release that popped out late in the afternoon. Jackman noted that the federal government had contributed $110 million to Quebec City but - up to the time he spoke - the feds just hadn't come across with the seven million Danny had decided was the "ask" for Cupids. Yeah, Jackman actually called it an "ask".
What Jackman didn't say is that the Quebec provincial government had ponied up $110 million of its own for the celebrations. They showed they were serious with hard currency. They didn't look on the thing as a slip-and-fall injury settlement negotiation, complete with an "ask". The feds rose to the bait and put up their own cash to match, dollar for dollar.
Clyde Jackman can make as man calls to Bill Rowe as he wants. He can send out as many "news" releases as he wants. The bottom is that if his boss was serious at all, he would have nodded to Clyde and let him spend provincial money on the Cupids celebrations. The feds would have followed suit. Heck, a little bit of sweet talk and salesmanship might have stroked some more money from them in an election year. Think about it. If such a pathetic provincial outlay could generate $15 million, imagine what $14 million in total would do for the people of Cupids.
For some entirely unexplained reason, though, the provincial cabinet doesn't seem to want to spend any money on things like the Cupids celebrations or even on fixing up hospitals, for that matter.
Wonder where all the cash is going?
-srbp-
IP Freely made have had a point last August.
Turns out the provincial cabinet had a whole bunch of things they were hiding, even more things than the stacks of files shown in this video.
Like studies on the physical condition of hospitals in the St. John's area.
Done in 2005 and kept secret for three years from a government that campaigned last fall on being accountable, transparent and open.
Here, for your Friday viewing pleasure is the old IP Freely video that asks an ever-appropriate question, asked, as the Gods of Irony decreed, by the Premier himself.
-srbp-
are square, not round.
That would be the bus of a government that just won a stunning election victory and yet now seems mired in mess after mess after mess.
The latest one - hospitals in desperate need of fixing up, a government report kept secret for two and a half years - is taken apart by the Telegram's editorial.
But after you've done with the editorial, take a look below to some of the comments. One comes from a fellow who says he's a manger with Eastern Health. He makes some interesting observations.
But the point is: he's making them, publicly.
Not so very long ago, public servants were deathly afraid of saying anything that did not conform to the tone from the top.
Heck. Public servants? Try just about anyone alive in the province. Who needed the phone calls at all hours of the day or night in which the person on the other end of the phone was able to recount in detail a private and supposedly privileged conversation among some tiny group or a board or what have you. There were times you'd have sworn the confessionals at the Basilica were bugged or the local priest was doing his patriotic duty by ratting out a dissident to the secular saviour's disciples.
Not so any more.
The news media are being a bit less wary in their remarks. The reporting is still solid and professional but there's less tolerance of bullshit.
Take for example, David Cochrane's comments on Here & Now's political panel. He pretty much stated it, as it was, right down to the comment about Wiseman burping up the existence of the report. Where Cochrane or Craig Westcott might have been the few to make observations openly that reflected less than positively on the current administration, the sharp stories are coming much more often and from others.
Things seem to be changing. It might just be temporary, but then again, there might be reasons why the administration seems remarkably unable to pull off the amateur poll goosing and pitcher planting of the old days.
That sounds like a topic for a weekend post.
-srbp-
Andy Wells finished up his day job as mayor today. He's heading off to new digs and much bigger salary as the guy running the provincial utility regulator.
Meanwhile, Ivan Morgan, the reporter who loves jam jams thought he'd give Andy a call and ask his view on having John Noseworthy audit the offshore regulatory board. That's the one an independent panel determined someone other than Wells was better qualified to run, based on merit criteria approved by both the federal and provincial governments.
So anyway, Morgan, who now prefers to take potshots at politicos in his news pieces than in his opinion column, got Andy's viewpoint now that Andy is leaving the board for the utilities crew.
Andy sees no problem with having Noseworthy go in and audit the board in every dimension.
Andy would hardly be expected to do anything to support the board, would he?
Or for that matter hold a consistent opinion in his head.
After all this is the guy who thought it a waste of tax dollars to shift provincial public servants from St. John's to the nether regions of the province.
But when the chance came to shift some federal public servants to this province, Wells was all over it as a phenomenal idea. You see, wells hopped on that bandwagon since it gave him a chance to toe the provincial Tory line and, if it worked, maybe hook up a few more bucks for his city's coffers.
See you can't keep pouring ever more money into Mile One without getting it from somewhere and a few high paying federal jobs would help keep the Wells-Coombs Memorial Money Pit going for a while longer.
Anyway, says Andy, bring John Noseworthy on in and let him have a go at the offshore board.
But last year, Wells had a different tune, at least when it came to the idea of having Noseworthy rotting around in Andy's fiefdom at city hall.
The auditor general (currently John Noseworthy) - whose reports annually shed an embarrassing light on the provincial government - could turn his attention to city hall if he wanted.
But Wells said there is no need, because the city already has an external audit process which produces reports annually.
No need.
Because there is already and external auditor.
Just like at the offshore board.
Makes you wonder if Wells had actually gotten the job at the offshore board, if Noseworthy would not have been told to piss off, in far less genteel a way than "piss off".
The guy who got the job Danny coveted for Andy never said Noseworthy couldn't come in and look the place over.
He just addressed the question, competently - egad - consistently.
-srbp-
MedicLink.
Money from the provincial government.
Same department that gave $675,000 to SAC Mfg.
Announcement on Monday.
Is it the same money - again - or new money?
-srbp-