- Roland Butler
- Kathy Dunderdale
- Roger Fitzgerald
- Tom Hedderson
- John Hickey
- Clyde Jackman
- Tom Marshall
- Sheila Osborne
- Patty Pottle
- Bob Ridgley
Think of it this way. When Danny took off, the Tories went from having five seats they could focus their attacks on to having about 15 seats where they could face a bit of fight to hang onto the seat. Now that doesn’t mean all the seats likely to be vacated above are likely to change hands. The 15 or so include seats where the Conservative incumbent is likely to seek re-election but where there is a certain level of local discontent.
Of the crew listed above, John Hickey has had his five best years to fatten up the pension and there’d be no real reason for him stick around anyway. Future premiers might be less inclined to keep him in cabinet. Doesn’t matter, though, since Hickey’s apparently got his sights on going federal in the next federal election.
Just think about that for a second. If the federal election comes in the spring, we could be seeing a provincial Conservative leadership racket and all the fund-raising that entails with a federal election and all the fund-raising that entails.
Then pull John Hickey and Tom Osborne off to run as federals and you potentially have a couple of seats coming up for grabs. Depending on the timing of the leadership and the general election, Danny’s electoral reform legacy could force the Conservatives into having by-elections at a very inconvenient time both for cash and for volunteers.
And before anyone chimes in that the two could just Beaton up and try to Tulk their seats back, there is simply the question of why would they. Both Hickey and Osborne are pensionable. At least in Osborne’s case, there are some other members of the clan with political ambitions ready to step into the seat.
But in Hickey’s case?
The seat could be up for grabs before the next provincial election.
More than a few provincial Conservatives are hoping Jack Layton doesn’t pick an inconvenient time to keep his promise to vote against the federal Conservatives on a confidence motion.
Anyway you look at it, 2011 is going to be a fascinating year in local politics.
- srbp -
11 comments:
Anyway you look at it, 2011 is going to be a fascinating year in local politics.
What is fascinating is how you can claim such a thing without even mentioning the word Liberal in your post.
Fascinating avoidance Ed!
There is no need to mention Liberals Murphy ,the PC party members are quite capable of making 2011 the year that goes down as possibly one of the dirtiest political climes in the history of this province.....
Dunderal announced this morning that she would be running again.
@ Murph - There is no pleasing you. When the focus is on Libs, you complain that he is needlessly ignoring the great governing force of our time. But when the focus is on PCs, you claim that they are being given the excess share of the limelight. There is no escaping that the PCs will be getting all the attention for the elephant-sized issue in the room: who will succeed? There is simply no escaping that it is the topmost political (as apposed to policy) issue of the days, weeks and months to come. Maybe the PCs would prefer to hold their leadership convention under a blanket?
Simon:
What she said today and what she does five months from now when she is no longer on the 8th are not necessarily the same thing. She's basically tulked up and as I suspect most people would accept the idea she's basically in a caretaker role as she heads for the exit. Fair enough. She's done her time and she's earned the graceful exit.
But as for promises of what a politician will do, you may recall a certain predecessor of hers who swore up and down that he would be around for the full four years after he called a premature election. He was gone within 18 months of his solemn vow and off to a job in Ottawa. He's not the only one to change his mind and no one would be surprised if Kathy packed it in shortly after Jerome or someone is sworn in to replace her.
You can't be serious. John Hickey running federally??? In Labrador???
Not even Hickey, in his wildest fantasies, would think that he would have even a glimmer of getting elected up there. There's no senate seat to dangle. No cushy job to promise.
Nobody, not even John Hickey, would give up another 4 years to bulk up his pension in return for being the sacrificial lamb in Labrador.
You must be making this up.
Art, as I have taken to saying many times: you just can't make this stuff up.
Now admittedly that one was a combination of a few rumours I've had from Labrador plus my own ideas of what Hickey might be up to but I'd say at this point he is more likely to run federally than, for argument sake, Tom Marshall is likely to run for the Tory leader's job.
Well that's pretty long odds given that Hickey is more likely to be in the SI Swimsuit edition, then the chances that Marshall wants to be leader.
@ Simon - There is no pleasing you. When the focus is on Libs, you complain that he is needlessly ignoring the great governing force of our time
You must be reading a different blog because NEVER EVER EVER has Ed mentioned anything about the Liberals. Never
I dare you to show me any "focus" on the Liberals. You are talking nonsense
Art, it isn't really a matter of what is sensible to the rest of us in all these cases.
Sometimes it is matter of what the politician wants to believe. Let's see if Hickey runs or not. In the meantime, we can still have fun talking about the idea.
Include Mr. Kennedy in this list. He will not be running.
So when did he tell you that, Steve?
Post a Comment