Here’s the official summary of a judge’s decision in a recent arson case:
Accused was charged with arson. The Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the fire was deliberately set and, if it was, that it was the accused who did it. The accused was acquitted.
Failed to prove anyone deliberately set the fire in the first place, let alone that the accused did it.
That’s pretty much the definition of epic fail.
-srbp-
As a rule, cabinet ministers should be able to tell you exactly what government policy is on any given subject. They all sit at the same table and they each have an obligation to support the policy they collectively decide.
When two ministers say starkly different things, then, you can understand that people tend to notice the discrepancy. The difference usually signals a major problem or controversy and that simply cannot stand. The principle of cabinet solidarity means that in public they must all sing the same song..
It’s bad enough when two ministers disagree. But when the difference is between the Premier and a minister, the matter becomes very serious. If there is one person who must know what government is doing, that person would be the first minister. If there is one person who gets to set government policy, it is the first minister. Everyone else just has an opinion.
The Iron Ore Company of Canada has made cuts to its offices in St.John’s, Montreal, Labrador City and Sept Iles, according to the weekly newspaper Le Nord-Cotier.
The company would not confirm how many positions were eliminated or how many people were affected.
IOC spokesperson Natalie Rouleau told the newspaper that the positions were redundancies and affected permanent staff, temporary employees and contract employees.
-srbp-
That big, ginormous phone-banging-up, trade dispute thingy with evil Ottawa?
So not happening any more.
"We seem to be back on track. We have alignment," Premier Kathy Dunderdale told reporters on Tuesday at an event announcing fitness grants to community groups.
All the talk the past week or so about negotiations between the crowd in Confederation Building and the crowd in Ottawa brought out the conventional wisdom about premiers using fights with the feds for political purposes.
The coincidence of a talk on nationalism the week before linked the two ideas together neatly for some people. Kathy Dunderdale was having a row with Ottawa, possibly to boost her polling and maybe as a show of nationalist fervour that we all love.
Yeah, maybe that’s true.
And then again, maybe it just isn’t.
Critics of the Muskrat Falls development pointed out over 18 months ago that the project would have problems meeting its electricity commitments.
Nalcor disputed that.
But this weekend, CBC’s Paul Withers told On Point host David Cochrane that Nalcor has refused to commit in writing to supply Nova Scotia with electricity beyond the original block of free electricity Emera will get as part of the basic deal.
That’s interesting.
Very interesting.
The original term sheet and the final capacity agreement basically commit the parties to work it out in the future on two conditions. First, Nova Scotia has to want the power for the long term. Second, Nalcor has to agree to supply it.
In the future.
If Nalcor had electricity to sell and Nova Scotia wanted it, then Nalcor should be locking them down and taking their cash. After all, a long-term power purchase agreement for an export customer is exactly what the Lower Churchill was supposed to be about.
Instead, Nalcor has decided to force local ratepayers in Newfoundland to cover the full cost, plus profit and ship electricity to Emera in Nova Scotia, effectively for nothing.
What’s more, if they sell any electricity from the project to industrial customers in Labrador, Nalcor will sell the power at a huge discount. According to Nalcor’s plan, everyone will get the benefit of Muskrat Falls except the people who will pay for it.
-srbp-
David Cochrane called it right the other day in the scrum with Kathy Dunderdale. He asked if she was laying the groundwork for a failure at the trade talks, a failure of her personal position.
Dunderdale denied it in the scrum, but her latest claim – full of the same vague and largely unsubstantiated claims as on Monday – sounds like someone who is trying to blame someone else before the talks finish and the end result doesn’t match what she’s been personally staking out as a position.
Russell Wangersky is a fine writer with a keen and insightful mind.
He is also an editor at the province’s largest circulation daily.
That’s the same place where former fisheries minister Trevor Taylor has been scribbling a column every week.
Premier Kathy Dunderdale (via NTV):
We’re looking for a ‘carve-out’ on the minimum processing regulations … so they’ll be exempted, and we want access to the European market on a number of our fish lines…
Carve out.
Hideous jargon for “not going to trade away” minimum processing regulations.
Period.
Fisheries minister Derrick Dalley (via the Telegram):
Fisheries Minister Derrick Dalley was at a media event in St. John’s Tuesday, where he assured reporters that the provincial government is not going to give away minimum processing requirements unless it’s a good deal.
Not going to trade away minimum processing requirements.
Oh wait.
There’s more.
So after a teaser column in the Telegram last week that was more creative fiction than serious history or memoir, John Crosbie explained why he loves the Muskrat Falls project in this Saturday’s instalment of Geriatric Townie Pass-times.
It’s really simple.
The project will be splendiferous.
Phantasmagorical.
Amazingly, marvellously, Keebler-elves-kinda-magical.
If you are still mulling over the British Columbia election result and the polls, take a look at this post by Eric Grenier at threehundredeight.com. It includes a link to his piece in the Globe on Wednesday on the same topic.
Pollsters tend to weight their samples to match the population as a whole. Problem: that isn’t the same as the demographic profile of voters.voters.
Grenier shows how Ipsos, for example, weighted a poll equally across three age groupings. In the 2013 election, those age groupings didn’t turn out equally. The over-55s made up half the total voter turn-out, not one third.
All this talk of Senator Beth Marshall and her hefty annual stipend for chairing a committee that has met once in two years brings to mind the good senator’s role in the House of Assembly patronage scam, a.k.a. the spending scandal.
Marshall is credited with first sniffing something was amiss when she went hunting for Paul Dick’s expenses in 2001-ish. She was barred from the House by the legislature’s internal economy commission. The members were Liberals and Tories and, as accounts have it, they unanimously wanted to keep Beth’s nose out of their files.
But if you go back and look, you’ll have a hard time finding any indication Beth thought something else was on the go. While we didn’t know it at the time, subsequent information confirmed that members had been handing out public cash pretty generously by that point. Yet Marshall has never, ever indicated she felt something more than a few wine and art purchases might have been amiss.
That’s important because of Marshall’s record once she got into the House herself as a member in 2003.
For the first day back after a long weekend, here are some short snappers on some issues swirling around these days at the national scene.